Six of fourteen models named Human Interest first on the direct prompt; four named Empower Retirement. Human Interest was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Empower Retirement by thirteen and Human Interest carries 41 labels and Empower Retirement 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the 401(k) providers page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Human Interest and Empower Retirement were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 92 answers naming Human Interest and the 100 naming Empower Retirement. In those answers Empower Retirement took the first choice three times and Human Interest nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“pricing surfaced in my search was $120 + $5 per eligible employee per month, which is typically higher than Guideline for small teams” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“As plans grow past $20M–$30M in assets or 500+ employees, traditional recordkeepers like Fidelity or Empower often provide better scale” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“though Human Interest had some service hiccups during rapid growth” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you want a modern, all‑in experience with automated compliance: Go with Human Interest or Betterment for Business.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend Human Interest if your priority is a modern 401(k) platform that's easy to administer and scale” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Human Interest is a strong alternative if you prioritize a modern, low-friction experience and high satisfaction scores” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Be most cautious with: Empower (service meltdowns)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“the SEC found that Empower entities inadequately disclosed conflicts and financial incentives tied to recommendations to enroll participants in that service” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“remains a mid-tier provider where plan design (chosen by your employer) determines whether you get good or bad options” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Scale / investment choice + fiduciary support: Fidelity Workplace Investing, Empower Retirement” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Empower, Vanguard, Fidelity, and ADP are frequently cited as top choices” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Why I'd lean Empower for a true mid-market B2B company” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.