Three of fourteen models named Lucidchart first on the direct prompt; zero named Miro. Lucidchart was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Miro by thirteen and Lucidchart carries 60 labels and Miro 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Lucidchart and Miro were named in the same answer ninety-four times, of the 186 answers naming Lucidchart and the 109 naming Miro. In those answers Miro took the first choice one time and Lucidchart eighteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Lucidchart, Visio, Canva, SmartDraw, and similar tools can create polished charts, but they usually require manual updates or imports, so the chart can become stale quickly.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like *Lucidchart* or *OrgChartNow* (good if you have extremely complex custom matrix structures ... though they require more manual maintenance)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“it produces diagrams that are a visual artifact, not a live system of record, with no role management, governance, analytics” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for: well-rounded professional visual diagrams and data-linked diagramming ... Best for creating org charts from existing data” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want a pure visual diagram and don't mind updating it manually, go with Lucidchart, Visio, SmartDraw, or Creately.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best all-rounder; data-linked diagramming; professional templates ... If you want a *picture*, use Lucidchart or Visio.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Lucidchart, Miro, Canva, or generic diagramming tools are great for visual design, but they don’t automatically pull or update from employee data” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“org charts are possible, but Miro is more of a whiteboard/workshop tool than a dedicated org chart system” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Miro – ⚠️ Not Purpose-Built - Better for brainstorming than dedicated org charting” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Lucidchart/Miro (for org charts + process maps)” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Testing found Miro is best for org chart maintenance with sync updates and automated recurring updates.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · alternative
“Miro is a collaborative visual planning tool that has a shared infinite canvas and is free to use.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.