Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Performance and talent management › Goals and OKRs › Lattice vs Teamflect
Goals and OKRs · November 2026 Edition

Lattice vs Teamflect

Zero of fourteen models named Lattice first on the direct prompt; zero named Teamflect. Lattice was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Teamflect by seven and Lattice carries 43 labels and Teamflect 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Lattice

accepted challenger

Named in fifteen categories this edition.

Teamflect

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share10%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels4311A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Lattice reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tability was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Tability vs Lattice · Tability vs Teamflect · Profit.co vs Lattice

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LatticeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTeamflect
Direct00
Paraphrase50
Comparative001 against Lattice
Budget-constrained021 against Lattice
Scale-constrained00
Negative004 against Lattice
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Lattice and Teamflect stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Lattice Teamflect first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lattice on the left and Teamflect on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Lattice and Teamflect stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniBetterworks alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Perdoo, WorkBoard
Gemini 3.5 FlashProfit.co alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
Grok 4.20Tability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome
Kimi K2Tability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.co
MiniMax M2.5Leapsome, Tability alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Lattice
GPT-6 LunaPerdoo alternatives: Betterworks, Lattice, Profit.co, WorkBoard

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability
Perplexity SonarCascade Strategy alternatives: Perdoo, Tability
Mistral SmallTability alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, Perdoo, Profit.co
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: 15Five, Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone
Muse Glimmer 30BTability alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome, Perdoo, Profit.co

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Lattice2%#13 of 20
Teamflect2%#11 of 20
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Lattice leads by six points.
Lattice10%#4 of 17
Teamflect4%#8 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Lattice leads by two points.
Lattice2%#7 of 11
Teamflect0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Lattice

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Avoid enterprise tools: Skip pricier ones like Lattice, 15Five, or Quantive” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative

What the models said about Teamflect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“It is widely cited as having the most generous free tier for startups, often allowing up to 10 users for free.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Tability vs LatticeTability vs TeamflectProfit.co vs LatticeProfit.co vs TeamflectPerdoo vs LatticePerdoo vs TeamflectLattice vs LeapsomeLattice vs OKRs ToolLattice vs MooncampLeapsome vs TeamflectOKRs Tool vs TeamflectMooncamp vs TeamflectAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full goals and okrs standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.