Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Performance and talent management › 360 feedback › Effy AI vs Leapsome
360 feedback · November 2026 Edition

Effy AI vs Leapsome

Zero of fourteen models named Effy AI first on the direct prompt; zero named Leapsome. Effy AI was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Leapsome by fourteen and Effy AI carries 14 labels and Leapsome 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Effy AI

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

Leapsome

accepted challenger

Named in seventeen categories this edition.

First-choice share9%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%3%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels1433A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Effy AI reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lattice was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs Effy AI · Lattice vs Leapsome · Spidergap vs Effy AI

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the 360 feedback page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Effy AIFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLeapsome
Direct00
Paraphrase01
Comparative11
Budget-constrained50
Scale-constrained01
Negative001 against Leapsome
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Effy AI and Leapsome stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Effy AI Leapsome first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Effy AI on the left and Leapsome on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Effy AI and Leapsome stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, People Element, Primalogik, Spidergap
Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard, Spidergap
Perplexity SonarLattice alternatives: Leapsome, Questback, Small Improvements, Spidergap
Grok 4.20Lattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, Spidergap
MiniMax M2.5Spidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice, Leapsome
GPT-6 LunaLattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome
Muse Glimmer 30BSpidergap alternatives: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniCulture Amp alternatives: CR360, EchoSpan, HiBob
Mistral SmallSpidergap alternatives: FeedbackPulse, Lattice, Synergita Perform
DeepSeek V4 FlashLattice, Spidergap alternatives: Culture Amp
Llama 4 MaverickSpidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, Lattice
Qwen 3.7 FlashLattice alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp
Kimi K2Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Spidergap
GLM 4.7 FlashXSpidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Effy AI leads by two points.
Effy AI4%#6 of 14
Leapsome2%#8 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Effy AI leads by five points.
Effy AI9%#4 of 18
Leapsome3%#6 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Effy AI0%#– of 11
Leapsome0%#8 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Effy AI

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“The best 360-degree feedback tool for a company with a limited budget is Effy AI, which offers a free plan up to 5 users” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want a purpose-built, affordable tool just for 360: → Spidergap or Effy AI” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Leapsome

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared
Lattice vs Effy AILattice vs LeapsomeSpidergap vs Effy AISpidergap vs LeapsomeCulture Amp vs Effy AICulture Amp vs LeapsomeEffy AI vs FeedbackPulseEffy AI vs TeamflectEffy AI vs 15FiveFeedbackPulse vs LeapsomeLeapsome vs TeamflectLeapsome vs 15FiveAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full 360 feedback standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.