Index › HR › Performance and talent management › 360 feedback › Effy AI vs FeedbackPulse
360 feedback · November 2026 Edition

Effy AI vs FeedbackPulse

Zero of fourteen models named Effy AI first on the direct prompt; zero named FeedbackPulse. Effy AI was named by eleven of the fourteen models and FeedbackPulse by eleven and Effy AI carries 14 labels and FeedbackPulse 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Effy AI

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

FeedbackPulse

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share9%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels1418A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Effy AI reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lattice was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs Effy AI · Lattice vs FeedbackPulse · Spidergap vs Effy AI

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the 360 feedback page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Effy AIFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFeedbackPulse
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative10
Budget-constrained54
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Effy AI and FeedbackPulse stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Effy AI FeedbackPulse first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Effy AI on the left and FeedbackPulse on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Effy AI and FeedbackPulse stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallSpidergap alternatives: FeedbackPulse, Lattice, Synergita Perform

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, People Element, Primalogik, Spidergap
GPT-5.4 miniCulture Amp alternatives: CR360, EchoSpan, HiBob
Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard, Spidergap
Perplexity SonarLattice alternatives: Leapsome, Questback, Small Improvements, Spidergap
Grok 4.20Lattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, Spidergap
DeepSeek V4 FlashLattice, Spidergap alternatives: Culture Amp
Llama 4 MaverickSpidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, Lattice
Qwen 3.7 FlashLattice alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Culture Amp
Kimi K2Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Spidergap
GLM 4.7 FlashXSpidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice
MiniMax M2.5Spidergap alternatives: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice, Leapsome
GPT-6 LunaLattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome
Muse Glimmer 30BSpidergap alternatives: BambooHR, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
FeedbackPulse leads by thirteen points.
FeedbackPulse16%#2 of 14
Effy AI4%#6 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Effy AI leads at mid-market.
Effy AI9%#4 of 18
FeedbackPulse7%#5 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Effy AI0%#– of 11
FeedbackPulse0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Effy AI

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“The best 360-degree feedback tool for a company with a limited budget is Effy AI, which offers a free plan up to 5 users” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want a purpose-built, affordable tool just for 360: → Spidergap or Effy AI” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about FeedbackPulse

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Start with FeedbackPulse (free tier) if you have fewer than 10 employees.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Teamflect (if you use Microsoft Teams) or FeedbackPulse” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“FeedbackPulse is the strongest overall choice” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.