Submittable vs Percent Pledge
Zero of fourteen models named Submittable first on the direct prompt; two named Percent Pledge. Submittable was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Percent Pledge by ten and both carry 21 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee giving and volunteering page.
By framing
SubmittableFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPercent Pledge
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Submittable and Percent Pledge were named in the same answer thirteen times, of the 50 answers naming Submittable and the 47 naming Percent Pledge. In those answers Percent Pledge took the first choice zero times and Submittable seven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Submittable Percent Pledge first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Submittable on the left and Percent Pledge on the right.The direct prompt
Percent Pledge first, Submittable not the choice
2 of 14 modelsSubmittable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Submittable8%#4 of 11Percent Pledge3%#6 of 11Submittable10%#4 of 12Percent Pledge3%#7 of 12Submittable0%#7 of 10Percent Pledge0%#– of 10What the models said about Submittable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“it may be a poor fit for organizations needing a full employee-giving platform, payroll giving, or donor CRM” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Submittable or Uncommon Giving as they offer the best combination of functionality, ease of use, and mid-market appropriate pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Benevity and Submittable are the most robust and scalable options” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Submittable is my top recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Percent Pledge
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“The best employee giving and volunteering platform for a mid-market B2B company is Percent Pledge, Uncommon Giving, or Selflessly.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“lean toward modern, high-agility CSR tools (such as *Deed*, *Groundswell*, *Percent Pledge*, or *Uncommon Giving*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Percent Pledge (Best Overall for Mid-Market)” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.