Employee giving and volunteering · November 2026 Edition
Selflessly vs Submittable
One of fourteen models named Selflessly first on the direct prompt; zero named Submittable. Selflessly was named by ten of the fourteen models and Submittable by fourteen and Selflessly carries 18 labels and Submittable 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share10%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1821A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Selflessly reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Uncommon Giving was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Uncommon Giving vs Selflessly · Uncommon Giving vs Submittable · Millie vs Selflessly
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee giving and volunteering page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SelflesslyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSubmittable
Direct10
Paraphrase06
Comparative00
Budget-constrained50
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Submittable
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Selflessly and Submittable stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Selflessly Submittable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Selflessly on the left and Submittable on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Selflessly and Submittable stood in it.
Selflessly first, Submittable not the choice
1 of 14 modelsSubmittable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Llama 4 MaverickPercent Pledge, Selflessly, Uncommon Giving
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarMillie alternatives: Deed, Groundswell, Selflessly
Grok 4.20Millie alternatives: Groundswell, Selflessly
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Bright Funds alternatives: Groundswell, Millie, Uncommon Giving
GPT-5.4 miniBenevity Enterprise Impact Platform alternatives: Groundswell, Millie
Gemini 3.5 FlashDeed alternatives: Alaya, Bright Funds, Groundswell, Percent Pledge
Mistral SmallUncommon Giving alternatives: Field Day, Millie, OnHand, Percent Pledge
DeepSeek V4 FlashUncommon Giving alternatives: Groundswell
Qwen 3.7 FlashUncommon Giving alternatives: Millie, Percent Pledge
Kimi K2Millie, Uncommon Giving alternatives: Groundswell
GLM 4.7 FlashXUncommon Giving alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform, Field Day
MiniMax M2.5Percent Pledge alternatives: Millie, Uncommon Giving
GPT-6 LunaMillie alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform, Blackbaud YourCause, Goodera
Muse Glimmer 30BUncommon Giving alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform, YourCause CSRconnect
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Selflessly leads by five points.
Selflessly13%#3 of 11Submittable8%#4 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Selflessly10%#3 of 12Submittable10%#4 of 12Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Selflessly0%#– of 10Submittable0%#7 of 10What the models said about Selflessly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Selflessly – Best for Small to Medium Businesses ... Specifically designed as an affordable option for smaller companies” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“For a company with a limited budget, Selflessly stands out as one of the best employee giving and volunteering platforms.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best option is usually Selflessly if you want an all-in-one employee giving + volunteering platform” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Submittable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“it may be a poor fit for organizations needing a full employee-giving platform, payroll giving, or donor CRM” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Submittable or Uncommon Giving as they offer the best combination of functionality, ease of use, and mid-market appropriate pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Benevity and Submittable are the most robust and scalable options” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Submittable is my top recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Uncommon Giving vs SelflesslyUncommon Giving vs SubmittableMillie vs SelflesslyMillie vs SubmittableSelflessly vs Benevity Enterprise Impact PlatformSelflessly vs GroundswellSelflessly vs Percent PledgeSelflessly vs Field DaySubmittable vs Benevity Enterprise Impact PlatformSubmittable vs GroundswellSubmittable vs Percent PledgeSubmittable vs Field DayAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full giving & volunteering standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.