Submittable vs Field Day
Zero of fourteen models named Submittable first on the direct prompt; zero named Field Day. Submittable was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Field Day by ten and Submittable carries 21 labels and Field Day 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Field Day
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee giving and volunteering page.
By framing
SubmittableFirst choices, of fourteen modelsField DayAcross every category in the November 2026 Edition, Submittable and Field Day were named in the same answer eleven times, of the 50 answers naming Submittable and the 44 naming Field Day. In those answers Field Day took the first choice zero times and Submittable zero.
Every model, every framing
| Model | DirectFD | ParaphraseFD | ComparativeFD | Budget-constrainedFD | Scale-constrainedFD | NegativeFD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | FD | ||||
| Mistral Small | FD | | FD | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | FD | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | FD | |||
| Kimi K2 | | FD | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | FD | | FD | FD | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | FD | FD | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | FD |
SubmittableFD Field Day first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Submittable on the left and Field Day on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Submittable8%#4 of 11Submittable10%#4 of 12Submittable0%#7 of 10What the models said about Submittable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“it may be a poor fit for organizations needing a full employee-giving platform, payroll giving, or donor CRM” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Submittable or Uncommon Giving as they offer the best combination of functionality, ease of use, and mid-market appropriate pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Benevity and Submittable are the most robust and scalable options” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Submittable is my top recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Field Day
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Tightest budget: Start with POINT (free) or Field Day (low per-user cost)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value for Small Teams (Under 100 Employees) Platform: Field Day” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for: Companies wanting a user-friendly interface with dynamic enterprise reporting” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.