Index › GTM › Sales › RFP response › Loopio vs DeepRFP
RFP response software · November 2026 Edition

Loopio vs DeepRFP

Twelve of fourteen models named Loopio first on the direct prompt; zero named DeepRFP. Loopio was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and DeepRFP by ten and Loopio carries 64 labels and DeepRFP 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Loopio

endorsed leader

Named in three categories this edition.

DeepRFP

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share31%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels6413A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Loopio reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Responsive was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Loopio vs PandaDoc · Loopio vs Responsive · Loopio vs 1up

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the RFP response software page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LoopioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDeepRFP
Direct120
Paraphrase30
Comparative90
Budget-constrained039 against Loopio · 1 against DeepRFP
Scale-constrained20
Negative304 against Loopio
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Loopio and DeepRFP were named in the same answer thirty-four times, of the 273 answers naming Loopio and the 42 naming DeepRFP. In those answers DeepRFP took the first choice eleven times and Loopio five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Loopio and DeepRFP stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Loopio DeepRFP first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Loopio on the left and DeepRFP on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Loopio and DeepRFP stood in it.

Loopio first, DeepRFP not the choice

12 of 14 modelsDeepRFP was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Loopio, Steerlab alternatives: AutoRFP.ai, SiftHub
GPT-5.4 miniLoopio alternatives: Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Gemini 3.5 FlashLoopio alternatives: AutoRFP.ai, Inventive AI, QorusDocs, Responsive
Perplexity SonarLoopio alternatives: RequestFX, Responsive, Steerlab
Grok 4.20Loopio alternatives: PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, Responsive
Mistral SmallLoopio alternatives: Responsive, Upland Qvidian
DeepSeek V4 FlashLoopio, Responsive alternatives: PandaDoc
Qwen 3.7 FlashLoopio alternatives: CQ Core, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
Kimi K2Loopio, Responsive alternatives: PandaDoc
GLM 4.7 FlashXLoopio, Responsive alternatives: Better Proposals, eBuyerAssist Platform
GPT-6 LunaLoopio alternatives: Responsive
Muse Glimmer 30BLoopio, Responsive alternatives: Upland Qvidian

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
MiniMax M2.5Responsive alternatives: Loopio, PandaDoc

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
DeepRFP leads by two points.
DeepRFP11%#3 of 12
Loopio9%#5 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Loopio leads at mid-market.
Loopio31%#1 of 11
DeepRFP6%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Loopio leads by twelve points.
Loopio12%#3 of 10
DeepRFP0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Loopio

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What to Avoid ... Loopio ... often require custom quotes typically ranging from $15,000 to $25,000+ per year” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid (Unless Budget Allows Later): Loopio | Requires a custom quote; ... still enterprise-oriented.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like Responsive (formerly RFPIO), Loopio, or full AutoRFP.ai” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Loopio — Often the top-rated for mid-market. Excellent content library, strong AI suggestions, clean collaboration, great Salesforce integration.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Prefer specialized RFP response platforms ... (e.g., Responsive/formerly RFPIO, Loopio, or alternatives like RocketDocs, Tribble, or AutoRFP.ai)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“the two names that consistently top the lists for RFP response / Strategic Response Management are Responsive, formerly RFPIO, and Loopio” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about DeepRFP

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“another low-cost option mentioned for freelancers and very small teams, though I'd verify fit carefully before buying” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best RFP response software for a company with a limited budget is DeepRFP, as it is a cheaper entry for small teams” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Built specifically for small business owners and lean proposal teams who don't want complex enterprise setups” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Tightest budget + need AI help: Start with DeepRFP's free trial.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.