Loopio vs Responsive
Twelve of fourteen models named Loopio first on the direct prompt; five named Responsive. Both were named by all fourteen models and Loopio carries 64 labels and Responsive 60, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
founded 2015. Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the RFP response software page.
By framing
LoopioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsResponsive
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Loopio and Responsive were named in the same answer 217 times, of the 273 answers naming Loopio and the 249 naming Responsive. In those answers Responsive took the first choice forty-seven times and Loopio twenty-seven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Loopio Responsive first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Loopio on the left and Responsive on the right.The direct prompt
Both were the first choice
4 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Loopio first, Responsive an alternative
8 of 14 modelsResponsive was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Responsive first, Loopio an alternative
1 of 14 modelsLoopio was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Responsive60%#1 of 10Loopio12%#3 of 10What the models said about Loopio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid ... Loopio ... often require custom quotes typically ranging from $15,000 to $25,000+ per year” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid (Unless Budget Allows Later): Loopio | Requires a custom quote; ... still enterprise-oriented.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like Responsive (formerly RFPIO), Loopio, or full AutoRFP.ai” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Loopio — Often the top-rated for mid-market. Excellent content library, strong AI suggestions, clean collaboration, great Salesforce integration.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Prefer specialized RFP response platforms ... (e.g., Responsive/formerly RFPIO, Loopio, or alternatives like RocketDocs, Tribble, or AutoRFP.ai)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“the two names that consistently top the lists for RFP response / Strategic Response Management are Responsive, formerly RFPIO, and Loopio” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Responsive
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Responsive (formerly RFPIO) - Multiple users report: Complicated UI with non-intuitive features - Steep learning curve (71+ mentions on G2)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms such as Responsive, Loopio, or Qvidian until proposal volume and revenue justify custom-priced software” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for mid-sized: Enterprise tools like Responsive (better for large corps with dedicated RFP teams)” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Prefer specialized RFP response platforms ... (e.g., Responsive/formerly RFPIO, Loopio, or alternatives like RocketDocs, Tribble, or AutoRFP.ai)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“the two names that consistently top the lists for RFP response / Strategic Response Management are Responsive, formerly RFPIO, and Loopio” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Responsive is one of the most comprehensive platforms on the market... Unmatched scalability and governance for large organizations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.