Zero of fourteen models named Supademo first on the direct prompt; zero named Walnut. Both were named by all fourteen models and Supademo carries 57 labels and Walnut 44, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interactive demo platforms page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Supademo and Walnut were named in the same answer seventy-seven times, of the 175 answers naming Supademo and the 124 naming Walnut. In those answers Walnut took the first choice one time and Supademo fifteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“High Caution: Supademo - High dissatisfaction rate: ~38% negative sentiment in recent comparisons” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Who to Avoid/Caution: Supademo (specifically the lower tiers)... its reliance on screenshot-based interactions means every UI tweak can render a demo inaccurate.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“While it ranks well for small businesses, Supademo's lower tiers have been flagged for issues such as reliance on screenshot-based interactions” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd suggest starting with Storylane or Supademo for their combination of ease of use, pricing flexibility, and robust feature sets” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for: Teams using demos across marketing, sales, onboarding, training, and support. Versatile all-in-one option.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“For the vast majority of budget-constrained companies, I'd recommend starting with Supademo's free plan.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Usually not the budget pick: Walnut — its published entry plan starts at $575/month billed annually” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for budgets: Enterprise-heavy options like Demostack, Reprise, Walnut, or Navattic” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Walnut and Reprise for now unless you have complex enterprise needs” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“requesting demos from 2–3 top fits like Storylane or Walnut to get a feel” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Enterprise sales, complex demos | Walnut or Reprise | Advanced personalization, live demo environments” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose Walnut if you are a large enterprise requiring deep CRM integration and strict security protocols.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.