Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › GTM › Sales › Interactive demos › Arcade vs Walnut
Interactive demo platforms · November 2026 Edition

Arcade vs Walnut

Zero of fourteen models named Arcade first on the direct prompt; zero named Walnut. Both were named by all fourteen models and Arcade carries 53 labels and Walnut 44, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Arcade

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Walnut

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share3%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5344A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Arcade reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Storylane was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Storylane vs Arcade · Storylane vs Walnut · Navattic vs Arcade

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interactive demo platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ArcadeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWalnut
Direct002 against Walnut
Paraphrase001 against Walnut
Comparative20
Budget-constrained202 against Arcade · 5 against Walnut
Scale-constrained01
Negative008 against Arcade · 2 against Walnut
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Arcade and Walnut were named in the same answer sixty-nine times, of the 147 answers naming Arcade and the 124 naming Walnut. In those answers Walnut took the first choice two times and Arcade eleven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Arcade and Walnut stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Arcade Walnut first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Arcade on the left and Walnut on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Arcade and Walnut stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniNavattic alternatives: Arcade, Consensus, Storylane
Gemini 3.5 FlashStorylane alternatives: Arcade, Navattic, Supademo, Walnut
DeepSeek V4 FlashNavattic, Storylane alternatives: Walnut
Llama 4 MaverickGuideflow alternatives: Arcade, Consensus, Fable, Navattic, Storylane, Supademo, Walnut
Qwen 3.7 FlashStorylane alternatives: Arcade, Guideflow, Navattic, Supademo
Kimi K2Navattic, Storylane alternatives: Arcade, Guideflow
GLM 4.7 FlashXStorylane alternatives: Arcade, Guideflow, Navattic, Supademo
Muse Glimmer 30BNavattic alternatives: Guideflow, Storylane, Supademo, Walnut

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Navattic, Storylane alternatives: Guideflow, HowdyGo
Perplexity SonarNavattic alternatives: Storylane, Supademo
Grok 4.20Navattic, Storylane
Mistral SmallNavattic, Storylane alternatives: Guideflow
MiniMax M2.5Demoboost, Navattic alternatives: Consensus, Storylane, Supademo
GPT-6 LunaNavattic alternatives: Storylane

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Arcade leads by twenty-one points.
Arcade21%#3 of 10
Walnut0%#10 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Arcade leads by two points.
Arcade3%#4 of 11
Walnut2%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Walnut leads at enterprise.
Walnut10%#4 of 10
Arcade0%#10 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Arcade

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“This platform has a relatively high negative share (32% criticized) among enterprise buyers, with concerns raised about its reliability and user experience.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Arcade - has a high negative rate, with 32% of labels being negative, and is considered a "criticized challenger"” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Free-Tier Heavy Platforms | Arcade (free tier, HTML on Enterprise+), Supademo (free, $38/user/mo Scale), Navattic (free tier) | Per-user pricing scales poorly” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“### 1. Arcade 🎮 Best for: Marketing teams, customer success, and fast demo creation” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“start with Supademo or Arcade for their low-cost plans and free tiers” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Best all-around for fast, polished demos: Arcade.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Walnut

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Usually not the budget pick: Walnut — its published entry plan starts at $575/month billed annually” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for budgets: Enterprise-heavy options like Demostack, Reprise, Walnut, or Navattic” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Walnut and Reprise for now unless you have complex enterprise needs” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“requesting demos from 2–3 top fits like Storylane or Walnut to get a feel” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Enterprise sales, complex demos | Walnut or Reprise | Advanced personalization, live demo environments” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose Walnut if you are a large enterprise requiring deep CRM integration and strict security protocols.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Storylane vs ArcadeStorylane vs WalnutNavattic vs ArcadeNavattic vs WalnutSupademo vs ArcadeSupademo vs WalnutArcade vs GuideflowWalnut vs GuideflowAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full interactive demos standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.