Apollo.io vs Qualified Piper
Four of fourteen models named Apollo.io first on the direct prompt; zero named Qualified Piper. Apollo.io was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Qualified Piper by eight and Apollo.io carries 30 labels and Qualified Piper 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty-two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.
By framing
Apollo.ioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsQualified Piper
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | ||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Apollo.io Qualified Piper first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apollo.io on the left and Qualified Piper on the right.The direct prompt
Apollo.io first, Qualified Piper not the choice
4 of 14 modelsQualified Piper was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Apollo.io20%#2 of 10Qualified Piper0%#– of 10Apollo.io19%#2 of 11Qualified Piper2%#5 of 11Qualified Piper4%#5 of 10Apollo.io0%#10 of 10What the models said about Apollo.io
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about Qualified Piper
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“If you want the lowest cost to start, pick Qualified.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“If by "prospects" you mainly mean engaging people who visit your website, rather than cold outbound, I'd look at Qualified instead.” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Qualified (Piper) if your biggest bottleneck is capturing, qualifying, and converting visitors” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.