Index › GTM › Sales › AI SDR › Apollo.io vs Amplemarket Duo
AI SDR agents · November 2026 Edition

Apollo.io vs Amplemarket Duo

Four of fourteen models named Apollo.io first on the direct prompt; one named Amplemarket Duo. Apollo.io was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Amplemarket Duo by ten and Apollo.io carries 30 labels and Amplemarket Duo 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Apollo.io

accepted challenger

San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty-two categories this edition.

Amplemarket Duo

accepted challenger

By Amplemarket, United States. Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share19%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels3013A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Apollo.io reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Artisan Ava was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. AiSDR vs Apollo.io · AiSDR vs Amplemarket Duo · Apollo.io vs Artisan Ava

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Apollo.ioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAmplemarket Duo
Direct41
Paraphrase30
Comparative001 against Amplemarket Duo
Budget-constrained201 against Amplemarket Duo
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Apollo.io and Amplemarket Duo stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Apollo.io Amplemarket Duo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apollo.io on the left and Amplemarket Duo on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Apollo.io and Amplemarket Duo stood in it.

Apollo.io first, Amplemarket Duo an alternative

4 of 14 modelsAmplemarket Duo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashApollo.io, Artisan Ava alternatives: AiSDR
Llama 4 MaverickApollo.io alternatives: AiSDR, Amplemarket Duo, Artisan Ava
Kimi K2AiSDR, Apollo.io alternatives: Artisan Ava
MiniMax M2.5Apollo.io, Artisan Ava alternatives: Amplemarket Duo

Amplemarket Duo first, Apollo.io an alternative

1 of 14 modelsApollo.io was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallAmplemarket Duo alternatives: Apollo.io, Artisan Ava

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Artisan Ava alternatives: AiSDR, Apollo.io, RocketSDR
Grok 4.2011x alternatives: AiSDR, Apollo.io, Artisan Ava, Breakout, Intercom
Qwen 3.7 FlashAiSDR alternatives: Amplemarket Duo, Apollo.io, Artisan Ava
GLM 4.7 FlashXAiSDR alternatives: Amplemarket Duo, Artisan Ava
Muse Glimmer 30BArtisan Ava alternatives: 11x.ai — Alice, AiSDR, Amplemarket Duo

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniUnify alternatives: AiSDR, Alta, Qualified Piper, Warmly
Gemini 3.5 FlashArtisan Ava alternatives: 11x, Qualified Piper, Regie.ai
Perplexity Sonar11x alternatives: Agent Frank, AiSDR, Artisan Ava, Regie.ai
GPT-6 LunaAiSDR alternatives: HubSpot Prospecting Agent, Unify

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Apollo.io leads by twenty points.
Apollo.io20%#2 of 10
Amplemarket Duo0%#– of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Apollo.io leads by seventeen points.
Apollo.io19%#2 of 11
Amplemarket Duo2%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Amplemarket Duo leads at enterprise.
Amplemarket Duo2%#8 of 10
Apollo.io0%#10 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Apollo.io

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Amplemarket Duo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Tools to Avoid on a Budget ... Amplemarket — $600/month, annual commitment” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“many are less autonomous than Artisan/11x and more focused on sequences, workflows, and assisted outreach” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Amplemarket Duo Copilot is the top recommendation due to its comprehensive features, high automation score, and strong user ratings” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“noted for its AI outbound and deliverability features, making it a good choice for companies that need to scale their outbound sales efforts” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Amplemarket offers an AI-assisted sales engagement workflow that keeps humans involved in message review and approval” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.