Zero of fourteen models named QCommission first on the direct prompt; zero named Performio. QCommission was named by nine of the fourteen models and Performio by fourteen and QCommission carries 16 labels and Performio 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales commissions and incentive compensation page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, QCommission and Performio were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 54 answers naming QCommission and the 116 naming Performio. In those answers Performio took the first choice three times and QCommission two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Limited integrations — notably doesn't integrate with Salesforce or many popular CRMs, which is a major limitation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Older versions of QCommission... often designed around manual CSV imports rather than real-time API syncing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Customization and data import limits come up in verified Capterra reviews.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“QCommission - Best Overall Value ... For the tightest budget, QCommission at $17/month offers the lowest entry point” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“QCommission if you need the absolute lowest cost per user” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: QCommission” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Spiff, Performio, or CaptivateIQ” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“caution if near-real-time data is a must-have. G2 material notes complaints about delayed updates and reporting performance” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“weak spots include an interface that feels dated, slow page loads with large datasets, occasional sync delays” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mid-Market Sweet Spot | CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Performio, Salesforce Spiff | Best balance of flexibility, speed-to-implement, and scale.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Highest ease + AI balance, scalable without tech experts | Can be pricier for very simple needs | 4.1/5 (top in many scorings)” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Performio is positioned as the clear leader for the best balance of ease of use and AI capabilities” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.