Zero of fourteen models named ContractSafe first on the direct prompt; one named DocuSign CLM. ContractSafe was named by twelve of the fourteen models and DocuSign CLM by twelve and ContractSafe carries 19 labels and DocuSign CLM 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
By Docusign, San Francisco, United States, founded 2003. Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the contract lifecycle management and e-signature page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ContractSafe and DocuSign CLM were named in the same answer twenty-four times, of the 59 answers naming ContractSafe and the 115 naming DocuSign CLM. In those answers DocuSign CLM took the first choice zero times and ContractSafe six.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Do not buy these expecting full lifecycle management.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Be Cautious About ContractSafe If You Are Procurement-Led” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“My practical pick: ContractSafe if your main need is contract repository, search, reminders, and simple lifecycle tracking on a budget” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“the best contract lifecycle management (CLM) platform is typically ContractSafe (starting at $450/month flat rate)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“PandaDoc and ContractSafe are the top recommendations for small businesses” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Dated user interface described as "reminiscent of designs from 2005"... Integration errors between CLM and signature workflows” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise solutions – Platforms like DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, or Icertis start at much higher price points” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-focused products such as Ironclad or DocuSign CLM” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Shortlist Ironclad, DocuSign CLM, Malbek, and one more based on your stack.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“### 1. The Best Overall: DocuSign CLM” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose DocuSign CLM or Conga if your contract process revolves almost entirely around your existing Salesforce CRM ecosystem” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.