Fourteen of fourteen models named Wistia first on the direct prompt; zero named YouTube. Both were named by all fourteen models and Wistia carries 79 labels and YouTube 55, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in three categories this edition.
San Bruno, United States, founded 2005. Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video marketing and hosting page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Wistia and YouTube were named in the same answer 133 times, of the 232 answers naming Wistia and the 156 naming YouTube. In those answers YouTube took the first choice twenty-two times and Wistia seventy-seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Consider Wistia only if video marketing becomes a core part of your strategy and you have budget for it” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“at a fraction of the cost of competitors like Wistia or Vidyard (which often start at $50–$80/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“excellent for marketing analytics and lead capture, but usually too expensive for very tight budgets” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Wistia is the strongest overall choice for marketers because its Business plan pairs video hosting with lead capture forms, CTAs, and analytics built for campaigns” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“For business use, most private platforms are better than YouTube. Wistia, Vimeo, SproutVideo, and Fastio all provide ad-free hosting with stronger privacy options.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · first choice
“Host on your website (via paid platforms like Wistia, Brightcove, or Vidyard for marketing-specific features like CTAs, heatmaps, and integrations)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“here are the video hosting platforms you should avoid or be cautious about for marketing: ## YouTube (when used as your primary business platform)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to avoid or use very carefully - Ad-supported social video platforms Examples: YouTube, TikTok, Facebook/Instagram Reels” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why be cautious/avoid for core marketing: Massive reach and SEO benefits, but you're building Google's audience, not yours.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“YouTube dominates for organic discovery and audience building, making it indispensable for brand awareness campaigns.” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“YouTube - The most popular choice for budget-conscious businesses. It's completely free to upload and host videos” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with YouTube if your main goal is reach and discovery—it's completely free and offers decent analytics” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.