Fourteen of fourteen models named Wistia first on the direct prompt; zero named Brightcove. Both were named by all fourteen models and Wistia carries 79 labels and Brightcove 41, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video marketing and hosting page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Wistia and Brightcove were named in the same answer 119 times, of the 232 answers naming Wistia and the 128 naming Brightcove. In those answers Brightcove took the first choice five times and Wistia sixty-nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Consider Wistia only if video marketing becomes a core part of your strategy and you have budget for it” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“at a fraction of the cost of competitors like Wistia or Vidyard (which often start at $50–$80/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“excellent for marketing analytics and lead capture, but usually too expensive for very tight budgets” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Wistia is the strongest overall choice for marketers because its Business plan pairs video hosting with lead capture forms, CTAs, and analytics built for campaigns” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“For business use, most private platforms are better than YouTube. Wistia, Vimeo, SproutVideo, and Fastio all provide ad-free hosting with stronger privacy options.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · first choice
“Host on your website (via paid platforms like Wistia, Brightcove, or Vidyard for marketing-specific features like CTAs, heatmaps, and integrations)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid committing to enterprise plans (Brightcove, Uscreen, etc.) unless you have a larger budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise platforms (Brightcove, Kaltura): Start at $20,000–$60,000/year” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid: ... Enterprise platforms like Brightcove (too expensive)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Consider platforms like Wistia, Vidyard, or Brightcove for advanced analytics, lead generation, and branding control.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · first choice
“Brightcove or Wistia would be excellent starting points for evaluation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · first choice
“Brightcove — If you need enterprise-grade security, live streaming at scale, and full platform features; premium price.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.