Index › GTM › Marketing › Video hosting › SproutVideo vs Gumlet
Video marketing and hosting · November 2026 Edition

SproutVideo vs Gumlet

Zero of fourteen models named SproutVideo first on the direct prompt; zero named Gumlet. SproutVideo was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Gumlet by seven and SproutVideo carries 33 labels and Gumlet 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

SproutVideo

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Gumlet

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels3310A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, SproutVideo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Wistia was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Wistia vs SproutVideo · Wistia vs Gumlet · YouTube vs SproutVideo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video marketing and hosting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SproutVideoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGumlet
Direct00
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained00
Negative101 against SproutVideo
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, SproutVideo and Gumlet were named in the same answer thirteen times, of the 81 answers naming SproutVideo and the 29 naming Gumlet. In those answers Gumlet took the first choice zero times and SproutVideo zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where SproutVideo and Gumlet stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
SproutVideo Gumlet first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SproutVideo on the left and Gumlet on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where SproutVideo and Gumlet stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Wistia alternatives: SproutVideo, Vidyard, Vimeo

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
Gemini 3.5 FlashVidyard, Wistia alternatives: YouTube
Perplexity SonarWistia alternatives: Goldcast, Vidyard, Vimeo, YouTube
Grok 4.20Wistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
Mistral SmallVidyard, Wistia alternatives: Vimeo
DeepSeek V4 FlashWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
Llama 4 MaverickVidyard, Vimeo, Wistia
Qwen 3.7 FlashWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
Kimi K2Wistia alternatives: Vidyard
GLM 4.7 FlashXWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
MiniMax M2.5Wistia alternatives: HubSpot Video, Vidyard, Vimeo
GPT-6 LunaWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo, YouTube
Muse Glimmer 30BWistia alternatives: Brightcove, Vidyard, Vimeo

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
SproutVideo3%#5 of 7
Gumlet3%#– of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
SproutVideo2%#5 of 11
Gumlet2%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
SproutVideo leads by four points.
SproutVideo6%#6 of 8
Gumlet2%#– of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about SproutVideo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Six of the best-known business video hosts store your files in the United States by default.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Wistia and SproutVideo are highly recommended business video hosting and analytics tools for mid-sized B2B companies” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most marketing teams, Wistia, Vimeo, or SproutVideo are better choices” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“SproutVideo starts ~$10/mo with lead capture on the entry paid tier, and is listed as an affordable branded host” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · alternative

What the models said about Gumlet

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“For most small businesses with a limited budget, Gumlet (starting at $6/month) offers the best combination of affordable pricing, unbranded player, and marketing tools” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Gumlet or Cloudinary: Strong for performance (multi-CDN, optimization), analytics, and cost predictability.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · alternative
“Gumlet — SOC 2/ISO 27001 certified, native CRM integrations, multi-CDN, more affordable entry point.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.