Index › GTM › Marketing › PR › Semrush AI PR Toolkit vs Agility PR Solutions
PR and media monitoring · November 2026 Edition

Semrush AI PR Toolkit vs Agility PR Solutions

Two of fourteen models named Semrush AI PR Toolkit first on the direct prompt; two named Agility PR Solutions. Semrush AI PR Toolkit was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Agility PR Solutions by thirteen and Semrush AI PR Toolkit carries 46 labels and Agility PR Solutions 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Semrush AI PR Toolkit

accepted challenger

By Semrush, Boston, United States, founded 2008. Named in one category this edition.

Agility PR Solutions

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share10%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels4630A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Semrush AI PR Toolkit reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Muck Rack was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Muck Rack vs Semrush AI PR Toolkit · Muck Rack vs Agility PR Solutions · Brand24 vs Semrush AI PR Toolkit

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the PR and media monitoring page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Semrush AI PR ToolkitFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAgility PR Solutions
Direct221 against Agility PR Solutions
Paraphrase101 against Agility PR Solutions
Comparative00
Budget-constrained203 against Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Semrush AI PR Toolkit · 2 against Agility PR Solutions
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Semrush AI PR Toolkit and Agility PR Solutions were named in the same answer twenty-six times, of the 103 answers naming Semrush AI PR Toolkit and the 58 naming Agility PR Solutions. In those answers Agility PR Solutions took the first choice one time and Semrush AI PR Toolkit three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Semrush AI PR Toolkit and Agility PR Solutions stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Semrush AI PR Toolkit Agility PR Solutions first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Semrush AI PR Toolkit on the left and Agility PR Solutions on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Semrush AI PR Toolkit and Agility PR Solutions stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
MiniMax M2.5Agility PR Solutions, Semrush AI PR Toolkit alternatives: Brand24, Muck Rack

Semrush AI PR Toolkit first, Agility PR Solutions not the choice

1 of 14 modelsAgility PR Solutions was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2Brand24, Semrush AI PR Toolkit alternatives: CisionOne

Agility PR Solutions first, Semrush AI PR Toolkit an alternative

1 of 14 modelsSemrush AI PR Toolkit was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Agility PR Solutions, Muck Rack alternatives: Mention, Semrush AI PR Toolkit

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMuck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Perplexity SonarMeltwater alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24, Muck Rack
Mistral SmallMeltwater, Muck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Mention, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
DeepSeek V4 FlashMuck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24
Llama 4 MaverickMuck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Meltwater, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Qwen 3.7 FlashBrand24, Meltwater alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Muse Glimmer 30BMeltwater alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24, CisionOne

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniMuck Rack alternatives: CisionOne, Meltwater
Grok 4.20Muck Rack alternatives: Brand24, Meltwater
GLM 4.7 FlashXMuck Rack alternatives: Brand24, Meltwater
GPT-6 LunaMuck Rack alternatives: CisionOne, Meltwater

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Semrush AI PR Toolkit leads by eighteen points.
Semrush AI PR Toolkit19%#2 of 12
Agility PR Solutions2%#7 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Semrush AI PR Toolkit leads by six points.
Semrush AI PR Toolkit10%#3 of 13
Agility PR Solutions4%#5 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Semrush AI PR Toolkit0%#– of 9
Agility PR Solutions0%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Semrush AI PR Toolkit

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“better suited to outreach and lighter monitoring than comprehensive broadcast or enterprise intelligence” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Prowly (~$258/month) are better for social-heavy or outreach-focused teams but may exceed tight budgets” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Cons: More expensive; monitoring alone isn't as strong as dedicated tools” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Prowly or Agility as they hit the sweet spot of enterprise-level features with mid-market pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“recommend Semrush AI PR Toolkit (formerly Prowly) as the best overall fit” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best value for a small company: Semrush AI PR Toolkit Pro” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Agility PR Solutions

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Verdict: Avoid unless you can negotiate iron-clad data accuracy guarantees and flexible exit terms.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“it appears less commonly favored than Muck Rack or Meltwater for mid-market use” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · soft negative
“Limited traditional media monitoring and mention caps on lower pricing plans.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Prowly or Agility as they hit the sweet spot of enterprise-level features with mid-market pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Agility PR Solutions is specifically recommended for mid-market teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Agility PR Solutions is repeatedly listed as ideal for "organizations and PR teams that require a wide breadth of monitoring sources"” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.