PR and media monitoring · November 2026 Edition
Muck Rack vs Agility PR Solutions
Nine of fourteen models named Muck Rack first on the direct prompt; two named Agility PR Solutions. Muck Rack was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Agility PR Solutions by thirteen and Muck Rack carries 57 labels and Agility PR Solutions 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
New York City, United States, founded 2009. Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share42%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels5730A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Muck Rack reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Meltwater was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Muck Rack vs Brand24 · Muck Rack vs Semrush AI PR Toolkit · Muck Rack vs Meltwater
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the PR and media monitoring page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Muck RackFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAgility PR Solutions
Direct921 against Agility PR Solutions
Paraphrase1201 against Agility PR Solutions
Comparative10
Budget-constrained003 against Muck Rack
Scale-constrained00
Negative202 against Muck Rack · 2 against Agility PR Solutions
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Muck Rack and Agility PR Solutions were named in the same answer forty-eight times, of the 161 answers naming Muck Rack and the 58 naming Agility PR Solutions. In those answers Agility PR Solutions took the first choice two times and Muck Rack eleven.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Muck Rack and Agility PR Solutions stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Muck Rack Agility PR Solutions first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Muck Rack on the left and Agility PR Solutions on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Muck Rack and Agility PR Solutions stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Claude Haiku 4.5Agility PR Solutions, Muck Rack alternatives: Mention, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Muck Rack first, Agility PR Solutions an alternative
8 of 14 modelsAgility PR Solutions was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniMuck Rack alternatives: CisionOne, Meltwater
Gemini 3.5 FlashMuck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Grok 4.20Muck Rack alternatives: Brand24, Meltwater
Mistral SmallMeltwater, Muck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Mention, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
DeepSeek V4 FlashMuck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24
Llama 4 MaverickMuck Rack alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Meltwater, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
GLM 4.7 FlashXMuck Rack alternatives: Brand24, Meltwater
GPT-6 LunaMuck Rack alternatives: CisionOne, Meltwater
Agility PR Solutions first, Muck Rack an alternative
1 of 14 modelsMuck Rack was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5Agility PR Solutions, Semrush AI PR Toolkit alternatives: Brand24, Muck Rack
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarMeltwater alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24, Muck Rack
Qwen 3.7 FlashBrand24, Meltwater alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Muse Glimmer 30BMeltwater alternatives: Agility PR Solutions, Brand24, CisionOne
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Kimi K2Brand24, Semrush AI PR Toolkit alternatives: CisionOne
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Muck Rack leads by six points.
Muck Rack8%#4 of 12Agility PR Solutions2%#7 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Muck Rack leads by thirty-eight points.
Muck Rack42%#1 of 13Agility PR Solutions4%#5 of 13Enterprise
Muck Rack leads by five points.
Muck Rack5%#3 of 9Agility PR Solutions0%#9 of 9What the models said about Muck Rack
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid big enterprise platforms like Meltwater, Cision, or Muck Rack” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Limited functionality and incomplete media coverage... Weak reporting/analysis and mobile support.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“powerful but generally use custom pricing and are harder to justify on a tight budget” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Choose Muck Rack if: Pitching journalists, maintaining media relationships, and having a modern CRM interface are your top priorities.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“The Industry Standard: Muck Rack ... has become the de facto standard for independent PR professionals and in-house B2B teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Muck Rack stands out as the best overall PR and media monitoring platform for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Agility PR Solutions
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Verdict: Avoid unless you can negotiate iron-clad data accuracy guarantees and flexible exit terms.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“it appears less commonly favored than Muck Rack or Meltwater for mid-market use” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · soft negative
“Limited traditional media monitoring and mention caps on lower pricing plans.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Prowly or Agility as they hit the sweet spot of enterprise-level features with mid-market pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Agility PR Solutions is specifically recommended for mid-market teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Agility PR Solutions is repeatedly listed as ideal for "organizations and PR teams that require a wide breadth of monitoring sources"” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Muck Rack vs Brand24Muck Rack vs Semrush AI PR ToolkitMuck Rack vs MeltwaterMuck Rack vs AwarioMuck Rack vs CisionOneMuck Rack vs Google AlertsBrand24 vs Agility PR SolutionsSemrush AI PR Toolkit vs Agility PR SolutionsMeltwater vs Agility PR SolutionsAgility PR Solutions vs AwarioAgility PR Solutions vs CisionOneAgility PR Solutions vs Google AlertsAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full PR standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.