Experimentation and personalization · November 2026 Edition
Convert Experiences vs PostHog
One of fourteen models named Convert Experiences first on the direct prompt; zero named PostHog. Convert Experiences was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and PostHog by twelve and Convert Experiences carries 41 labels and PostHog 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in nine categories this edition.
First-choice share16%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4121A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Convert Experiences reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.VWO was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. VWO vs Convert Experiences · VWO vs PostHog · Convert Experiences vs GrowthBook
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the experimentation and personalization page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Convert ExperiencesFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPostHog
Direct101 against Convert Experiences
Paraphrase80
Comparative00
Budget-constrained021 against Convert Experiences
Scale-constrained10
Negative10
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Convert Experiences and PostHog stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Convert Experiences PostHog first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Convert Experiences on the left and PostHog on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Convert Experiences and PostHog stood in it.
Convert Experiences first, PostHog not the choice
1 of 14 modelsPostHog was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashConvert Experiences, VWO alternatives: Mutiny, Personyze
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Qwen 3.7 FlashVWO alternatives: Convert Experiences, Mutiny
MiniMax M2.5Personyze alternatives: Convert Experiences, VWO
Muse Glimmer 30BVWO alternatives: Convert Experiences, Mutiny, Optimizely CMS, Personyze
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5VWO alternatives: Mutiny, Personyze
GPT-5.4 miniOptimizely CMS alternatives: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, VWO
Gemini 3.5 FlashVWO alternatives: AB Tasty, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kameleoon
Perplexity SonarHubSpot Content Hub alternatives: Abmatic AI, Croct, Mutiny, VWO, Webflow Optimize
Grok 4.20Croct alternatives: AB Tasty, Kameleoon, VWO
Mistral SmallHubSpot Content Hub alternatives: Optimizely CMS, Personyze, VWO
Llama 4 MaverickHubSpot Content Hub
Kimi K2VWO alternatives: Mutiny, Personyze
GLM 4.7 FlashXPersonyze alternatives: HubSpot Content Hub, Optimizely CMS, Right Message, VWO
GPT-6 LunaVWO alternatives: AB Tasty
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Convert Experiences leads by five points.
Convert Experiences10%#3 of 16PostHog5%#7 of 16Mid-marketThe figures above
Convert Experiences leads by thirteen points.
Convert Experiences16%#2 of 14PostHog3%#6 of 14Enterprise
Convert Experiences leads by three points.
Convert Experiences3%#6 of 13PostHog0%#– of 13What the models said about Convert Experiences
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“consider Convert or Evergage if you need more advanced capabilities, though these lean more toward the enterprise end of mid-market pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“transparent monthly plans from $299/mo billed annually ... That's plan-around pricing but not "limited budget" free.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“Convert Experiences and VWO are the top recommendations due to their balance of features, ease of use, and integration capabilities.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For Full-Stack Experimentation (High Tech/Mid-Market): Convert Experiences or Kameleoon. Both are praised for ease of use” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Tight budget, marketer-led, low traffic, needs CRM bucketing: Convert Experiences or VWO Experience Optimization.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about PostHog
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Developer-led, zero cost to start: PostHog or GrowthBook. PostHog if you want analytics + experiments in one UI” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
VWO vs Convert ExperiencesVWO vs PostHogConvert Experiences vs GrowthBookConvert Experiences vs PersonyzeConvert Experiences vs Optimizely CMSConvert Experiences vs AB TastyConvert Experiences vs MutinyGrowthBook vs PostHogPersonyze vs PostHogOptimizely CMS vs PostHogPostHog vs AB TastyPostHog vs MutinyAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full experimentation standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.