Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › GTM › Marketing › App store optimization › AppTweak vs Appfigures
App store optimization tools · November 2026 Edition

AppTweak vs Appfigures

Fourteen of fourteen models named AppTweak first on the direct prompt; zero named Appfigures. AppTweak was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Appfigures by thirteen and AppTweak carries 63 labels and Appfigures 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.

AppTweak

endorsed leader

Named in two categories this edition.

Appfigures

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share51%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels6335A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, AppTweak reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.AppTweak vs AppFollow · AppTweak vs MobileAction · AppTweak vs Sensor Tower

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the app store optimization tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AppTweakFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAppfigures
Direct1402 against Appfigures
Paraphrase111
Comparative110
Budget-constrained033 against AppTweak
Scale-constrained10
Negative102 against AppTweak · 1 against Appfigures
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, AppTweak and Appfigures were named in the same answer eighty-five times, of the 225 answers naming AppTweak and the 98 naming Appfigures. In those answers Appfigures took the first choice nine times and AppTweak forty.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where AppTweak and Appfigures stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
AppTweak Appfigures first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, AppTweak on the left and Appfigures on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where AppTweak and Appfigures stood in it.

AppTweak first, Appfigures an alternative

14 of 14 modelsAppfigures was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5AppTweak alternatives: App Radar, MobileAction
GPT-5.4 miniAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, Sensor Tower, StoreMaven
Gemini 3.5 FlashAppTweak alternatives: AppFollow, Mobile Action
Perplexity SonarAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, AppFollow, SplitMetrics Optimize
Grok 4.20AppTweak alternatives: SplitMetrics Optimize
Mistral SmallAppTweak
DeepSeek V4 FlashAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, Appfigures, FoxData
Llama 4 MaverickAppTweak
Qwen 3.7 FlashAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, MobileAction
Kimi K2AppTweak alternatives: AppFollow
GLM 4.7 FlashXAppTweak
MiniMax M2.5AppTweak alternatives: SplitMetrics Optimize
GPT-6 LunaAppTweak alternatives: AppFollow, MobileAction
Muse Glimmer 30BAppTweak

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
AppTweak16%#3 of 12
Appfigures16%#2 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
AppTweak leads by forty-three points.
AppTweak51%#1 of 10
Appfigures8%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
AppTweak leads by thirty-one points.
AppTweak31%#2 of 11
Appfigures0%#11 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about AppTweak

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid premium tools like AppTweak (~$79+/month), Sensor Tower, or MobileAction unless scaling up” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-tier tools like Sensor Tower, AppTweak ($79+/mo)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“AppTweak: 9% of the labels were negative, with some models mentioning that "almost all major ASO tools (e.g., AppTweak, MobileAction, Sensor Tower, AppFigures, Astro) offer proprietary metrics... these metrics are not transparent."” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“AppTweak, Sensor Tower, or Mobile Action: These are frequently recommended in 2023–2024 reviews for keyword research and performance tracking” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose AppTweak if you want the best overall "all-in-one" tool... It is the most popular recommendation for professional app managers today.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Frequently listed as the keyword-focused leader for improving rankings... AppTweak is the classic keyword research & search rankings tool” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Appfigures

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“almost all major ASO tools (e.g., AppTweak, MobileAction, Sensor Tower, AppFigures, Astro) offer proprietary metrics... these metrics are not transparent.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“More budget-friendly option that covers basics well, though may lack some advanced features needed for competitive B2B markets.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Others like Appfigures or Asolytics are more budget-oriented but miss advanced features.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Verdict: Start with AppFigures. Their $9.99 entry point allows you to monitor your real-time performance accurately” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“upgrading to Appfigures ($44.99/month) when you're ready for active keyword tracking” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“AppTweak or AppFigures would be the best starting points.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
AppTweak vs AppFollowAppTweak vs MobileActionAppTweak vs Sensor TowerAppFollow vs AppfiguresMobileAction vs AppfiguresAppfigures vs Sensor TowerAll ten head-to-head pages and the full app store optimization standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.