AppTweak is an App Store marketing and intelligence platform for mobile app teams, covering app store optimization (ASO) and Apple Ads · apptweak.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
App Radar is first at 16%.
Ranked first. Next is AppFollow at 10%. 14 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Sensor Tower is first at 46%.
“AppTweak, Sensor Tower, or Mobile Action: These are frequently recommended in 2023–2024 reviews for keyword research and performance tracking”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · first choice
“Choose AppTweak if you want the best overall "all-in-one" tool... It is the most popular recommendation for professional app managers today.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Frequently listed as the keyword-focused leader for improving rankings... AppTweak is the classic keyword research & search rankings tool”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
“AppTweak is best suited for mid-to-large app developers, publishers, and agencies that need a comprehensive, data-driven ASO platform”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · first choice
“Avoid premium tools like AppTweak (~$79+/month), Sensor Tower, or MobileAction unless scaling up”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid enterprise-tier tools like Sensor Tower, AppTweak ($79+/mo)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“AppTweak: 9% of the labels were negative, with some models mentioning that "almost all major ASO tools (e.g., AppTweak, MobileAction, Sensor Tower, AppFigures, Astro) offer proprietary metrics... these metrics are not transparent."”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“Many enterprise-focused ASO platforms (e.g., AppTweak, Sensor Tower) have custom pricing starting at $25,000+/year. If you're a mid-market company, these tools may be unnecessary”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as AppTweak, over the 225 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 159 | 24 | Compare → | |
| 131 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 102 | 12 | View → | |
| 85 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 84 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 38 | 1 | View → | |
| 37 | 2 | View → | |
| 36 | 3 | View → | |
| 33 | 0 | View → | |
| 32 | 7 | View → |
What the models named instead of AppTweak →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on AppTweak's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 211 of the 225 answers that named AppTweak and are not a share of its labels.
540 of the 705 domain citations in answers naming AppTweak came from a third party's page. Fifty-seven were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 54 | 2 | 2026-07-13 | ||
| Case study | 38 | 1 | 2026-07-06 | ||
| Comparison | 21 | 0 | 2025-12-18 | SEO | |
| Conference or event | 7 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-01-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-04-11 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2025-10-03 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2025-02-19 |
Every page apptweak.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.