data.ai
Gane, the publisher, sells software in Competitive intel, where this product is measured. It is measured there by the same method as every other product. How the conflict is handled.
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
App Radar is first at 16%.
AppTweak is first at 51%.
Sensor Tower is first at 46%.
Why models recommend it
“Choose data.ai if you need ASO tied to broader mobile intelligence and ad insights.”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · alternative
“Best For: Large enterprises focused on market share and long-term strategy.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Mobile-app competition: Sensor Tower/data.ai”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Legacy enterprise tool, more market research than operational ASO”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · warning
“not an enterprise suite like Sensor Tower / data.ai”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · warning
“data.ai and Appfigures for potential value issues”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as data.ai, over the 49 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | 9 | View → | |
| 38 | 12 | View → | |
| 24 | 3 | View → | |
| 20 | 3 | View → | |
| 15 | 3 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → | |
| 7 | 1 | View → | |
| 7 | 0 | View → | |
| 6 | 0 | View → | |
| 5 | 1 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 41 of the 49 answers that named data.ai and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for data.ai, so its own site is not marked. Sixteen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |