Index › GTM › Marketing › App store optimization › Appfigures vs Sensor Tower
App store optimization tools · November 2026 Edition

Appfigures vs Sensor Tower

Zero of fourteen models named Appfigures first on the direct prompt; zero named Sensor Tower. Appfigures was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Sensor Tower by fourteen and Appfigures carries 35 labels and Sensor Tower 54, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Appfigures

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Sensor Tower

criticized challenger

United States, founded 2013. Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share8%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%37%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3554A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Appfigures reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.AppTweak was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. AppTweak vs Appfigures · AppTweak vs Sensor Tower · AppFollow vs Appfigures

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the app store optimization tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AppfiguresFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSensor Tower
Direct002 against Appfigures · 7 against Sensor Tower
Paraphrase106 against Sensor Tower
Comparative00
Budget-constrained304 against Sensor Tower
Scale-constrained01
Negative011 against Appfigures · 3 against Sensor Tower
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Appfigures and Sensor Tower were named in the same answer sixty-one times, of the 98 answers naming Appfigures and the 184 naming Sensor Tower. In those answers Sensor Tower took the first choice five times and Appfigures seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Appfigures and Sensor Tower stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Appfigures Sensor Tower first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Appfigures on the left and Sensor Tower on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Appfigures and Sensor Tower stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, Sensor Tower, StoreMaven
DeepSeek V4 FlashAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, Appfigures, FoxData

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5AppTweak alternatives: App Radar, MobileAction
Gemini 3.5 FlashAppTweak alternatives: AppFollow, Mobile Action
Perplexity SonarAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, AppFollow, SplitMetrics Optimize
Grok 4.20AppTweak alternatives: SplitMetrics Optimize
Mistral SmallAppTweak
Llama 4 MaverickAppTweak
Qwen 3.7 FlashAppTweak alternatives: App Radar, MobileAction
Kimi K2AppTweak alternatives: AppFollow
GLM 4.7 FlashXAppTweak
MiniMax M2.5AppTweak alternatives: SplitMetrics Optimize
GPT-6 LunaAppTweak alternatives: AppFollow, MobileAction
Muse Glimmer 30BAppTweak

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Appfigures leads by sixteen points.
Appfigures16%#2 of 12
Sensor Tower0%#12 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Appfigures leads by six points.
Appfigures8%#4 of 10
Sensor Tower2%#5 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Sensor Tower leads at enterprise.
Sensor Tower46%#1 of 11
Appfigures0%#11 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Appfigures

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“almost all major ASO tools (e.g., AppTweak, MobileAction, Sensor Tower, AppFigures, Astro) offer proprietary metrics... these metrics are not transparent.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“More budget-friendly option that covers basics well, though may lack some advanced features needed for competitive B2B markets.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Others like Appfigures or Asolytics are more budget-oriented but miss advanced features.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Verdict: Start with AppFigures. Their $9.99 entry point allows you to monitor your real-time performance accurately” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“upgrading to Appfigures ($44.99/month) when you're ready for active keyword tracking” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“AppTweak or AppFigures would be the best starting points.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Sensor Tower

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid premium tools like AppTweak (~$79+/month), Sensor Tower, or MobileAction unless scaling up” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Sensor Tower for mid-market—it's enterprise-focused at $5,000+/month.” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-tier tools like Sensor Tower, AppTweak ($79+/mo)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Sensor Tower: The industry leader for market intelligence. Best for revenue estimates, ad intelligence, and understanding high-level market trends.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“AppTweak, Sensor Tower, or Mobile Action: These are frequently recommended in 2023–2024 reviews” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“More focused on large-scale market analysis than day-to-day listing execution; often excessive for small apps.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.