Session replay and heatmaps · November 2026 Edition
Dealfront vs Contentsquare
Zero of fourteen models named Dealfront first on the direct prompt; zero named Contentsquare. Dealfront was named by ten of the fourteen models and Contentsquare by thirteen and Dealfront carries 10 labels and Contentsquare 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Paris, France, founded 2008. Named in seven categories this edition.
First-choice share12%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels1030A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Dealfront reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Clarity was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Clarity vs Dealfront · Microsoft Clarity vs Contentsquare · Hotjar vs Dealfront
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the session replay and heatmaps page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DealfrontFirst choices, of fourteen modelsContentsquare
Direct003 against Contentsquare
Paraphrase612 against Contentsquare
Comparative011 against Contentsquare
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Contentsquare
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Dealfront and Contentsquare stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Dealfront Contentsquare first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Dealfront on the left and Contentsquare on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Dealfront and Contentsquare stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Clarity alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, UXCam
GPT-6 LunaFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, PostHog
Muse Glimmer 30BFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Hotjar, Mouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Microsoft Clarity
Gemini 3.5 FlashPostHog alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Perplexity SonarHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Grok 4.20Hotjar alternatives: Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Mistral SmallHotjar alternatives: Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
DeepSeek V4 FlashHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Llama 4 MaverickMouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, UXCam
Qwen 3.7 FlashLogRocket alternatives: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Kimi K2PostHog alternatives: LogRocket, Mouseflow
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Clarity alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Dealfront leads by eight points.
Dealfront8%#– of 11Contentsquare0%#10 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Dealfront leads by ten points.
Dealfront12%#3 of 16Contentsquare2%#8 of 16Enterprise
The order flips: Contentsquare leads at enterprise.
Contentsquare14%#2 of 12Dealfront0%#– of 12What the models said about Dealfront
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about Contentsquare
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid overly enterprise tools like Contentsquare unless you have very high traffic/budgets.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Instead of buying an expensive enterprise platform (like full Contentsquare or Quantum Metric which can run $30k–$50k+/year)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“warned about common misreading errors (cherry-picking, streetlight effects) that can lead to misleading conclusions” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“My default pick: Contentsquare Growth for a mid-sized B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best enterprise suite: Contentsquare” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Contentsquare, Glassbox, or Quantum Metric when scale, enterprise governance, and advanced experience analytics justify a larger platform.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Clarity vs DealfrontMicrosoft Clarity vs ContentsquareHotjar vs DealfrontHotjar vs ContentsquareDealfront vs FullstoryDealfront vs PostHogDealfront vs MouseflowDealfront vs LogRocketFullstory vs ContentsquarePostHog vs ContentsquareMouseflow vs ContentsquareLogRocket vs ContentsquareAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full session replay standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.