Two of fourteen models named Vitally first on the direct prompt; zero named HubSpot Service Hub. Vitally was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and HubSpot Service Hub by thirteen and Vitally carries 65 labels and HubSpot Service Hub 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in nine categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer success platforms page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Vitally and HubSpot Service Hub were named in the same answer seventy-three times, of the 178 answers naming Vitally and the 330 naming HubSpot Service Hub. In those answers HubSpot Service Hub took the first choice thirteen times and Vitally fourteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Praised for Notion-like design but has negative reviews on functionality, understaffed support, slow feature delivery, and uneven post-sale attention” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“While Vitally generally has higher user satisfaction ratings than Gainsight, it has specific friction points that can lead to team burnout.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“It's polished for SMBs but may stretch a very tight budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“AI-powered, unified views, and automation. Excellent for mid-market teams wanting a clean CSM workspace without heavy Ops overhead.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Many experts suggest that under ~1,000 customers, Vitally or Custify are often the right fit.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Best For: Mid-market companies looking for a balance of power and ease of use.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“multiple Reddit users ranked HubSpot as the worst customer success tool they'd used” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Not a dedicated pure-play CS platform... Lacks advanced health scoring, predictive AI, and sophisticated playbook automation” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“HubSpot Service Hub (Free tier or Starter plan) is generally the best customer success platform for companies with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“For a company with a limited budget, HubSpot Service Hub is the best default choice” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.