Four of fourteen models named Retell AI first on the direct prompt; zero named PolyAI. Retell AI was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and PolyAI by twelve and Retell AI carries 55 labels and PolyAI 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI voice agents page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Retell AI and PolyAI were named in the same answer forty-eight times, of the 152 answers naming Retell AI and the 59 naming PolyAI. In those answers PolyAI took the first choice six times and Retell AI twelve.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Not recommended if you need a no-code launch or a predictable flat monthly bill.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Cautious on data privacy if integrating deeply with CRMs/APIs (extra attack surfaces). Hallucinations remain a core issue.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“strong overall reviews, but users mention higher cost per call, missing features, and setup complexity in some cases” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Excellent for production-scale support automation; reliable for regulated industries; good balance of ease and power.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Retell AI if you want to build complex, multi-step workflows ... Their visual editor is superior here.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Currently a market leader in this space... Choose Retell AI or Vapi if you are building a product feature” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise-heavy options like PolyAI or Cognigy unless your needs are highly regulated” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Mid-Sized B2B: PolyAI — Excellent but built for enterprise contact centers” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“avoid enterprise-heavy solutions like PolyAI (~$150K/year)” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · hard negative
“PolyAI — strong for enterprise call centers with complex routing and handoff” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“PolyAI if you're closer to enterprise scale and need broader contact-center or omnichannel capabilities” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · alternative
“PolyAI is stronger if you want a more managed enterprise-grade inbound voice automation experience” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.