Supplier management · November 2026 Edition
Kodiak Hub vs Jaggaer
Two of fourteen models named Kodiak Hub first on the direct prompt; one named Jaggaer. Kodiak Hub was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Jaggaer by fourteen and Kodiak Hub carries 18 labels and Jaggaer 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%34%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1829A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Kodiak Hub reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Procurify was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Procurify vs Kodiak Hub · Procurify vs Jaggaer · Gatekeeper vs Kodiak Hub
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the supplier management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Kodiak HubFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJaggaer
Direct211 against Kodiak Hub · 3 against Jaggaer
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained002 against Jaggaer
Scale-constrained00
Negative005 against Jaggaer
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Kodiak Hub and Jaggaer stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Kodiak Hub Jaggaer first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Kodiak Hub on the left and Jaggaer on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Kodiak Hub and Jaggaer stood in it.
Kodiak Hub first, Jaggaer not the choice
2 of 14 modelsJaggaer was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5Gatekeeper, Kodiak Hub alternatives: Procurify
GPT-6 LunaKodiak Hub alternatives: Gatekeeper, Precoro
Jaggaer first, Kodiak Hub not the choice
1 of 14 modelsKodiak Hub was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashJaggaer alternatives: Kissflow Procurement, Proactis, Tipalti, Verifai
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Precoro alternatives: GEP SMART, Kodiak Hub, Spendflo
Gemini 3.5 FlashZip alternatives: CloudEagle, Gatekeeper, Graphite Connect, Kodiak Hub, Precoro, Procurify, Tropic
Perplexity SonarGatekeeper alternatives: Kodiak Hub, Precoro, Procurify
Llama 4 MaverickGatekeeper alternatives: Kodiak Hub, Payhawk, Procurify
Muse Glimmer 30BProcurify alternatives: Coupa, Gatekeeper, Kodiak Hub, Precoro
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniProcurify alternatives: Coupa, Omnea, SAP Ariba
Grok 4.20Procurify alternatives: Gatekeeper, Precoro
Mistral SmallProcurify alternatives: Gatekeeper, Precoro, SupplierGATEWAY, Zip
DeepSeek V4 FlashPrecoro, Procurify alternatives: Gatekeeper
Kimi K2Precoro, Procurify alternatives: Gatekeeper, Tradogram, Zip
GLM 4.7 FlashXProcurify alternatives: Gatekeeper, Precoro, Tradogram, Zip
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Kodiak Hub0%#– of 9Jaggaer0%#– of 9Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: Jaggaer leads at enterprise.
Jaggaer2%#5 of 9Kodiak Hub0%#8 of 9What the models said about Kodiak Hub
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“excellent for deep supplier development (G2 4.6), but it is a custom-quote platform often better suited for manufacturing firms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Gatekeeper or Kodiak Hub represent the best balance of functionality, ease of use, and value” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest general recommendation is Kodiak Hub” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Kodiak Hub” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Jaggaer
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Unlike large enterprise suites like SAP Ariba or JAGGAER—which can take 6–12 months to deploy and carry heavy administrative overhead” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pure enterprise tools like SAP Ariba, Coupa, Ivalua, or Jaggaer” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Best All-Around for Scalability: Jaggaer ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-market to large enterprises” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Procurify vs Kodiak HubProcurify vs JaggaerGatekeeper vs Kodiak HubGatekeeper vs JaggaerTradogram vs Kodiak HubTradogram vs JaggaerPrecoro vs Kodiak HubPrecoro vs JaggaerKodiak Hub vs IvaluaKodiak Hub vs CoupaIvalua vs JaggaerJaggaer vs CoupaAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full supplier management standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.