Tradogram vs Jaggaer
Zero of fourteen models named Tradogram first on the direct prompt; one named Jaggaer. Tradogram was named by eight of the fourteen models and Jaggaer by fourteen and Tradogram carries 11 labels and Jaggaer 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the supplier management page.
By framing
TradogramFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJaggaer
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Tradogram and Jaggaer were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 125 answers naming Tradogram and the 253 naming Jaggaer. In those answers Jaggaer took the first choice zero times and Tradogram five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Tradogram Jaggaer first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Tradogram on the left and Jaggaer on the right.The direct prompt
Jaggaer first, Tradogram not the choice
1 of 14 modelsTradogram was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Tradogram21%#2 of 9Jaggaer0%#– of 9Jaggaer2%#5 of 9Tradogram0%#– of 9What the models said about Tradogram
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“If you need full procurement (POs, contracts, approvals) → Tradogram (free tier first, then ~$99–225/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Tradogram ($99/month) if you need a professional solution with room to grow” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Budget Procurement & Supplier Management: Tradogram” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Jaggaer
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Unlike large enterprise suites like SAP Ariba or JAGGAER—which can take 6–12 months to deploy and carry heavy administrative overhead” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pure enterprise tools like SAP Ariba, Coupa, Ivalua, or Jaggaer” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Best All-Around for Scalability: Jaggaer ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-market to large enterprises” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.