Ivalua vs Jaggaer
Zero of fourteen models named Ivalua first on the direct prompt; one named Jaggaer. Ivalua was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Jaggaer by fourteen and Ivalua carries 25 labels and Jaggaer 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the supplier management page.
By framing
IvaluaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJaggaer
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Ivalua and Jaggaer were named in the same answer 195 times, of the 326 answers naming Ivalua and the 253 naming Jaggaer. In those answers Jaggaer took the first choice zero times and Ivalua twenty-one.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Ivalua Jaggaer first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Ivalua on the left and Jaggaer on the right.The direct prompt
Jaggaer first, Ivalua not the choice
1 of 14 modelsIvalua was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was named
13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Ivalua0%#7 of 9Jaggaer0%#– of 9Ivalua2%#6 of 11Jaggaer2%#7 of 11What the models said about Ivalua
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“What to Avoid - SAP Ariba, Coupa, Ivalua — ... overkill for most mid-sized companies” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pure enterprise tools like SAP Ariba, Coupa, Ivalua, or Jaggaer” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
What the models said about Jaggaer
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Unlike large enterprise suites like SAP Ariba or JAGGAER—which can take 6–12 months to deploy and carry heavy administrative overhead” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pure enterprise tools like SAP Ariba, Coupa, Ivalua, or Jaggaer” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Best All-Around for Scalability: Jaggaer ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-market to large enterprises” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.