Supplier management · November 2026 Edition
Gatekeeper vs Jaggaer
Three of fourteen models named Gatekeeper first on the direct prompt; one named Jaggaer. Gatekeeper was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Jaggaer by fourteen and Gatekeeper carries 34 labels and Jaggaer 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
First-choice share14%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate12%34%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels3429A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Gatekeeper reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Procurify was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Procurify vs Gatekeeper · Procurify vs Jaggaer · Gatekeeper vs Tradogram
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the supplier management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GatekeeperFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJaggaer
Direct313 against Jaggaer
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained104 against Gatekeeper · 2 against Jaggaer
Scale-constrained10
Negative005 against Jaggaer
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Gatekeeper and Jaggaer stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Gatekeeper Jaggaer first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Gatekeeper on the left and Jaggaer on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Gatekeeper and Jaggaer stood in it.
Gatekeeper first, Jaggaer not the choice
3 of 14 modelsJaggaer was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Perplexity SonarGatekeeper alternatives: Kodiak Hub, Precoro, Procurify
Llama 4 MaverickGatekeeper alternatives: Kodiak Hub, Payhawk, Procurify
MiniMax M2.5Gatekeeper, Kodiak Hub alternatives: Procurify
Jaggaer first, Gatekeeper not the choice
1 of 14 modelsGatekeeper was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashJaggaer alternatives: Kissflow Procurement, Proactis, Tipalti, Verifai
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashZip alternatives: CloudEagle, Gatekeeper, Graphite Connect, Kodiak Hub, Precoro, Procurify, Tropic
Grok 4.20Procurify alternatives: Gatekeeper, Precoro
Mistral SmallProcurify alternatives: Gatekeeper, Precoro, SupplierGATEWAY, Zip
DeepSeek V4 FlashPrecoro, Procurify alternatives: Gatekeeper
Kimi K2Precoro, Procurify alternatives: Gatekeeper, Tradogram, Zip
GLM 4.7 FlashXProcurify alternatives: Gatekeeper, Precoro, Tradogram, Zip
GPT-6 LunaKodiak Hub alternatives: Gatekeeper, Precoro
Muse Glimmer 30BProcurify alternatives: Coupa, Gatekeeper, Kodiak Hub, Precoro
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Precoro alternatives: GEP SMART, Kodiak Hub, Spendflo
GPT-5.4 miniProcurify alternatives: Coupa, Omnea, SAP Ariba
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Gatekeeper0%#6 of 9Jaggaer0%#– of 9Mid-marketThe figures above
Gatekeeper leads by twelve points.
Gatekeeper14%#2 of 11Jaggaer2%#7 of 11Enterprise
The order flips: Jaggaer leads at enterprise.
Jaggaer2%#5 of 9Gatekeeper0%#9 of 9What the models said about Gatekeeper
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise solutions (SAP Ariba, Coupa, Jaggaer, Gatekeeper)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Gatekeeper starts around $10,500 a year, which makes it the benchmark to quote back at vendors who will not give you a number.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“About $875/month[1] | More expensive, but stronger contract and vendor governance features” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best supplier management software for a company with a limited budget is Gatekeeper, which starts at around $10,500 a year.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Mid-market platforms like Gatekeeper (~$10,500/year starting) or Precoro (~$499/month) might be appropriate” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Gatekeeper or Kodiak Hub represent the best balance of functionality, ease of use, and value” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Jaggaer
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Unlike large enterprise suites like SAP Ariba or JAGGAER—which can take 6–12 months to deploy and carry heavy administrative overhead” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pure enterprise tools like SAP Ariba, Coupa, Ivalua, or Jaggaer” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Best All-Around for Scalability: Jaggaer ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-market to large enterprises” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Procurify vs GatekeeperProcurify vs JaggaerGatekeeper vs TradogramGatekeeper vs PrecoroGatekeeper vs Kodiak HubGatekeeper vs IvaluaGatekeeper vs CoupaTradogram vs JaggaerPrecoro vs JaggaerKodiak Hub vs JaggaerIvalua vs JaggaerJaggaer vs CoupaAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full supplier management standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.