Index › Finance › Spend and procurement › Supplier management › Small business · November 2026 Edition
Supplier management for small business buyers
Asked as “supplier management software”, and as “vendor onboarding and information management platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 42 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Tradogram 21%
29Precoro21Tradogram21oboloo29others
29% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Precoro held the lead, +2 points on 27%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Precoro29%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
Procurify18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Procurify (18%) replaces Precoro (14% then, 8% now), 10 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
SAP Ariba35%Contested=heldSince October 2026: 35% → 35%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Precoro29%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketProcurify18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Procurify (18%) replaces Precoro (14% then, 8% now), 10 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseSAP Ariba35%Contested=heldSince October 2026: 35% → 35%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Precoro29%11%56accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.27% → 29%
Precoro29%11%56accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.27% → 29%02
Tradogram21%3%32accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 24% → 21%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.24% → 21%
Tradogram21%3%32accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 24% → 21%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.24% → 21%03
oboloo21%0%14accepted challenger▲+13Since October 2026: 8% → 21%, +13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.8% → 21%
oboloo21%0%14accepted challenger▲+13Since October 2026: 8% → 21%, +13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement.8% → 21%04Procurify2%7%28accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Procurify2%7%28accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%05
Ramp2%8%13accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 2%
Ramp2%8%13accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.10% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09SAP Ariba0%91%34criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP Ariba0%91%34criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Coupa0%84%32criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Coupa0%84%32criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Ivalua0%82%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Ivalua0%82%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
Gatekeeper0%10%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Gatekeeper0%10%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Procurify vs Kodiak HubProcurify vs IvaluaProcurify vs JaggaerProcurify vs CoupaGatekeeper vs TradogramGatekeeper vs PrecoroGatekeeper vs Kodiak HubGatekeeper vs IvaluaGatekeeper vs JaggaerGatekeeper vs CoupaTradogram vs PrecoroTradogram vs Kodiak HubTradogram vs IvaluaTradogram vs JaggaerTradogram vs CoupaPrecoro vs Kodiak HubPrecoro vs IvaluaPrecoro vs JaggaerPrecoro vs CoupaKodiak Hub vs IvaluaKodiak Hub vs JaggaerKodiak Hub vs CoupaIvalua vs JaggaerIvalua vs CoupaJaggaer vs Coupa
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Precoro29%
Precoro29%02Tradogram21%
Tradogram21%03oboloo21%
oboloo21%04Procurify2%
Procurify2%05Ramp2%
Ramp2%06Gatekeeper0%
Gatekeeper0%07Ivalua0%
Ivalua0%08Coupa0%
Coupa0%09SAP Ariba0%
SAP Ariba0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP Ariba91%
31 of 34 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 13 hard negative
“for most small businesses Coupa and SAP Ariba/SAP Business Network are best avoided unless you have enterprise spend scale” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Coupa84%
27 of 32 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“Pricing for enterprise suites like Coupa often starts at $2,500/month, which is out of reach for most smaller finance teams.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Ivalua82%
9 of 11 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Why to avoid/be cautious: Both are highly sophisticated end-to-end procurement and supplier management suites” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Jaggaer89%
8 of 9 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“excluded because they typically require 6‑18 month implementations and cost $150 K‑$3 M+ annually” GLM 4.7 FlashX, comparative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 881 links across 212 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 24 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
50 answers · 99 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra38 answers · 74 citations · 12 models
37 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G226 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Precoro18 answers · 33 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Striven17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · LineNow16 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
publisher (Gane)15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Payhawk15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · MESH Works14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · oboloo13 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sourceforge13 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
30 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best supplier management software”, “supplier management platforms”, “supplier management software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precoro precoro.com | 29% | 341 | 1,000 | 3 | 82,966 | 86 | ||
| Tradogram tradogram.com | 21% | 124 | 880 | 4 | 208,129 | 1 | ||
| oboloo oboloo.com | 21% | 50 | 20 | 0 | 11,787 | |||
| Procurify procurify.com | 2% | 278 | 4,400 | 43 | 62,225 | $282 | 14 | 8 |
| Ramp ramp.com | 2% | 916 | 246,000 | 49,733 | 770,056 | $13,511 | 120 | |
| Tipalti tipalti.com | 2% | 490 | 18,100 | 381 | 213,652 | $83,363 | 120 | |
| Softr softr.io | 2% | 5 | 368,000 | 279 | 146,476 | 45 | ||
| Zoho parent site Zoho Procurement 2% | 2% | 14 | ||||||
| LineNow linenow.co | 2% | 3 | ||||||
| Spendwise spendwise.com | 2% | 22 | 720 | 3 | 401 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (payhawk.com). The first result for “best supplier management software” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best supplier management software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vendor onboarding and information management platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top supplier management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best supplier management software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a supplier management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which supplier management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5LineNowagainst: Coupa, SAP Aribano first choiceChangedagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaLineNowagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaSpendwise, Tradogramno first choiceagainst: CobbleStone Software, Ivalua, SAP Ariba, ServiceTitan, VendorPM
Three alternatives
Kissflow Procurement, Precoro, ProcureOne alternative
ProcessWeaverFour alternatives
Gatekeeper, Precoro, Procurify, TradogramTwo alternatives
Kissflow Procurement, PrecoroGPT-5.4 miniOnspringRoutableChangedCoupaagainst: Jaggaer, ZycusPrecoroagainst: Mitratech Prevalent, Onspringno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Coupa, Mitratech Prevalent, QuickBooks Online, RampTwo alternatives
Claryn, The Vendor HubTwo alternatives
Ivalua, SAP AribaTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, RampGemini 3.5 FlashPrecoroagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaTipaltiChangedagainst: CoupaPrecoro, Procurifyagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaRampno first choiceagainst: Coupa, SAP Aribaagainst: Aravo, Coupa, GEP SMART, Ivalua, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, ProcessUnity, Resilinc, SAP Ariba
Five alternatives
Airbase, Gatekeeper, Procurify, Tradogram, ZipSeven alternatives
Conveyor / Trustpage, Gatekeeper, Precoro, Secureframe, Softr, Stampli, VantaFour alternatives
Gatekeeper, Ramp, Tipalti, TradogramFive alternatives
Airtable, Monday.com, Precoro, Tradogram, Zoho EcosystemPerplexity SonarTradogramagainst: Coupa, Ivalua, SAP AribaPrecoroChangedagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaPrecoro, Tradogramagainst: Coupa, GEP SMART, Jaggaer, Kodiak Hub, SAP Aribaobolooagainst: Gatekeeper, Precorono first choiceagainst: Coupa, Gatekeeper, Ivalua, Jaggaer, SAP Ariba
Four alternatives
Payhawk, Precoro, Procurify, obolooFour alternatives
AgilityPortal, Compliancely, Introw, TipaltiFour alternatives
Gatekeeper, Payhawk, Pipefy, ProcurifyOne alternative
Team ProcureGrok 4.20Tradogramagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAPTradogramHeldProcurementExpress.comagainst: Coupa, Kodiak Hub, LineNow, SAP Aribaobolooagainst: Jaggaer, Oracle NetSuite, Precorono first choiceagainst: Coupa, SAP Aribaagainst: Avetta, Coupa, EcoVadis, Inventory Source, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, Oracle NetSuite, SAP Ariba, Tradogram
Two alternatives
Precoro, StrivenSix alternatives
Coupa, Gatekeeper, Precoro, Striven, Tipalti, Zenwork PaymentsFive alternatives
Gatekeeper, Precoro, Striven, SupplierGATEWAY, Team ProcureTwo alternatives
Free-Procurement Project, TradogramMistral SmallPrecorono first choiceChangedobolooagainst: PrecoroPrecorono first choiceagainst: Coupa, Precoro, Procurify, SAP Ariba, SAP Cloud ERP
Two alternatives
Striven, TradogramFive alternatives
Avetta, Gatekeeper, Kodiak Hub, Market Dojo, ProcurifyThree alternatives
Kissflow Procurement, Tradogram, Zoho ProcurementDeepSeek V4 FlashTradogramTradogramHeldagainst: Gatekeeper, RampPrecoroagainst: ZipobolooPrecoroagainst: Coupa, Ivalua, SAP Aribaagainst: Avetta, Coupa, SAP Ariba
Three alternatives
Gatekeeper, Precoro, ProcurifyOne alternative
PrecoroFour alternatives
Gatekeeper, Procurify, Ramp, VrooziThree alternatives
Market Dojo, Precoro, TradogramThree alternatives
Gatekeeper, ProcurementExpress.com, ProcurifyLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choicePrecoro, oboloono first choiceagainst: Blaze.tech, Coupa, HICX, Ivalua, Jaggaer, Kinaxis, Precoro, Procurify, Relex, SAP Ariba, o9
Qwen 3.7 FlashPrecoroagainst: Oracle Network, SAP AribaVendorJotChangedagainst: Coupa, SAP AribaPrecorooboloono first choiceagainst: Asana, Coupa, Monday.com, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP Ariba, Salesforce
Three alternatives
Gatekeeper, ProcureDesk, ProcurifyThree alternatives
Kodiak Hub, Precoro, obolooThree alternatives
Gatekeeper, Kissflow Procurement, Zapro AITwo alternatives
AuraVMS, TradogramKimi K2TradogramTradogramHeldTradogramagainst: Kissflow Procurementobolooagainst: Coupa, Jaggaer, Precoro, SAP Aribano first choiceagainst: SAP Aribaagainst: Coupa, Ivalua, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP Ariba
Four alternatives
B2B Wave, Precoro, ProcurementExpress.com, RampTwo alternatives
Precoro, RampFour alternatives
Airbase, AuraVMS, Precoro, ProcurifyFour alternatives
AuraVMS, Market Dojo, Procuman, TradogramSeven alternatives
Bonfire, ContractWorks, Ironclad Clickwrap, Precoro, Procurify, SourceDay, ZipGLM 4.7 FlashXno first choiceSoftrChangedagainst: Airtable, Opstream, SmartSuitePrecoroagainst: Coupa, Ivalua, Jaggaer, SAP Aribaoboloono first choiceagainst: Avetta
Two alternatives
Gatekeeper, Hubler.aiSix alternatives
Anvyl, Gatekeeper, MESH Works, Procurify, SourceDay, TradogramFour alternatives
AuraVMS, Tradogram, VNDLY, Zoho InventoryMiniMax M2.5MRPeasy, PrecoroPrecoroChangedagainst: TipaltiPrecorooboloono first choiceagainst: SAP Aribaagainst: Avetta, SAP Ariba
One alternative
StrivenThree alternatives
Gatekeeper, Tradogram, VendorVaultThree alternatives
Gatekeeper, Loopio, ProcurifyFour alternatives
Airtable, Market Dojo, Odoo, PrecoroGPT-6 LunaZoho ProcurementPlytixChangedRampTradogramno first choiceagainst: Coupa, Ivalua, Jaggaer, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, SAP Ariba
One alternative
PrecoroFour alternatives
Gatekeeper, Precoro, Procurify, TradogramThree alternatives
Airtable, Ramp, Zoho ProcurementMuse Glimmer 30BPrecoro, ProcurifyPrecoroChangedPrecoroagainst: Coupa, SAP Aribaoboloono first choiceagainst: Coupa, SAP Ariba
Three alternatives
B2B Wave, ProcurementExpress.com, TradogramTwo alternatives
Aptien, SoftrFive alternatives
Anvyl, Gatekeeper, MESH Works, Procurify, TradogramTwo alternatives
InstaSupply, Market DojoBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 8 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 8 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 14 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 24 | 187 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:22 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:24 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 25 | 182 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 23 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 15 | 94 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 12 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 15 | 48 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 24 | 115 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 18 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:51 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:51 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:53 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 13 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:46 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:29 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:00 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 13 | 198 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:59 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:03 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:54 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 13 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 18 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 13 | 65 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 23 | 41 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ariba read as SAP Ariba
Ariba (SAP) read as SAP Ariba
Kissflow read as Kissflow Procurement
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
Oracle Procurement Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement
SAP Ariba / SAP Business Network read as SAP Ariba
Unresolved, counted raw
APEX by LeanDNA
AgilityPortal
Airtable Free Plan
Aptien
BlueCart
Claryn
Compliancely
Concord
Content Snare
ContractWorks
Conveyor / Trustpage
Google Sheets with Zapier
Hubler.ai
Introw
Ironclad Clickwrap
LaunchBay
Odoo One App Free
Officewise
Opstream
Oracle Network
Plytix
ProcessWeaver
Procure
Purchaser.ai
The Vendor Hub
Tipalti Select
Touchpoint
VendorJot
VendorPM
Zoho Ecosystem (Zoho Books + Zoho Inventory)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.