Index › Finance › Spend and procurement › Strategic sourcing › oboloo vs Market Dojo
Strategic sourcing · November 2026 Edition

oboloo vs Market Dojo

Zero of fourteen models named oboloo first on the direct prompt; zero named Market Dojo. oboloo was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Market Dojo by nine and oboloo carries 11 labels and Market Dojo 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

oboloo

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Market Dojo

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share14%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1116A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, oboloo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.oboloo vs Prokuria · oboloo vs GEP SMART · oboloo vs Procurify

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the strategic sourcing page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
obolooFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMarket Dojo
Direct00
Paraphrase02
Comparative00
Budget-constrained82
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, oboloo and Market Dojo were named in the same answer twenty-one times, of the 50 answers naming oboloo and the 44 naming Market Dojo. In those answers Market Dojo took the first choice one time and oboloo twelve.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where oboloo and Market Dojo stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
oboloo Market Dojo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, oboloo on the left and Market Dojo on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where oboloo and Market Dojo stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Corcentric Sourcing, Coupa, Zycus alternatives: Ivalua, Market Dojo, Proactis Sourcing
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: Archlet, Market Dojo, Scanmarket, Tropic, Vertice, Zip
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcurify alternatives: GEP SMART, Market Dojo, Precoro, Prokuria
GLM 4.7 FlashXno first choice alternatives: Market Dojo, Precoro, Procurify, Prokuria, TYASuite Procurement, Tradogram
GPT-6 LunaWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: Coupa, GEP Quantum Intelligence, GEP SMART, Market Dojo

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: GEP SMART, Ivalua, SAP Ariba Sourcing Suite
Perplexity SonarGEP SMART alternatives: Jaggaer, Proactis, Procurify
Grok 4.20Procurify alternatives: Coupa, GEP SMART
Mistral SmallIvalua, SAP Ariba alternatives: P3Source, Team Procure
Llama 4 MaverickGEP SMART alternatives: Jaggaer, Oxalys, Proactis
Qwen 3.7 FlashCoupa Business Buying alternatives: GEP SMART, Ivalua, Jaggaer
Kimi K2Procurify alternatives: Coupa, Ivalua, Jaggaer, Prokuria
MiniMax M2.5Prokuria alternatives: Coupa, TYASuite Procurement
Muse Glimmer 30BProkuria alternatives: Precoro, Procol, Procurify, cusoso Target

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
oboloo leads by five points.
oboloo12%#3 of 18
Market Dojo8%#5 of 18
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
oboloo leads by seven points.
oboloo14%#1 of 15
Market Dojo7%#3 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
oboloo is not named for this buyer.
oboloo—not named
Market Dojo0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about oboloo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“That makes it the cheapest way to get strategic sourcing capability with unlimited users and no credit card required.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“If your budget is very limited, oboloo is the best choice due to its free plan and comprehensive features.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Market Dojo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Market Dojo is described as best for cost-conscious teams needing full sourcing workflows, offering a freemium sourcing suite” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Market Dojo for a mid-sized B2B company.” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Market Dojo (Best Overall for Pure E-Sourcing & Auctions)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.