Index › Finance › Spend and procurement › Strategic sourcing › Market Dojo vs Procurify
Strategic sourcing · November 2026 Edition

Market Dojo vs Procurify

Zero of fourteen models named Market Dojo first on the direct prompt; three named Procurify. Market Dojo was named by nine of the fourteen models and Procurify by nine and Market Dojo carries 16 labels and Procurify 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Market Dojo

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Procurify

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share7%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1613A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Market Dojo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.oboloo vs Market Dojo · oboloo vs Procurify · Prokuria vs Market Dojo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the strategic sourcing page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Market DojoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProcurify
Direct031 against Procurify
Paraphrase21
Comparative00
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Market Dojo and Procurify stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Market Dojo Procurify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Market Dojo on the left and Procurify on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Market Dojo and Procurify stood in it.

Procurify first, Market Dojo an alternative

3 of 14 modelsMarket Dojo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.20Procurify alternatives: Coupa, GEP SMART
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcurify alternatives: GEP SMART, Market Dojo, Precoro, Prokuria
Kimi K2Procurify alternatives: Coupa, Ivalua, Jaggaer, Prokuria

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Corcentric Sourcing, Coupa, Zycus alternatives: Ivalua, Market Dojo, Proactis Sourcing
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: Archlet, Market Dojo, Scanmarket, Tropic, Vertice, Zip
Perplexity SonarGEP SMART alternatives: Jaggaer, Proactis, Procurify
GLM 4.7 FlashXno first choice alternatives: Market Dojo, Precoro, Procurify, Prokuria, TYASuite Procurement, Tradogram
GPT-6 LunaWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: Coupa, GEP Quantum Intelligence, GEP SMART, Market Dojo
Muse Glimmer 30BProkuria alternatives: Precoro, Procol, Procurify, cusoso Target

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: GEP SMART, Ivalua, SAP Ariba Sourcing Suite
Mistral SmallIvalua, SAP Ariba alternatives: P3Source, Team Procure
Llama 4 MaverickGEP SMART alternatives: Jaggaer, Oxalys, Proactis
Qwen 3.7 FlashCoupa Business Buying alternatives: GEP SMART, Ivalua, Jaggaer
MiniMax M2.5Prokuria alternatives: Coupa, TYASuite Procurement

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Market Dojo leads by six points.
Market Dojo8%#5 of 18
Procurify2%#7 of 18
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Market Dojo7%#3 of 15
Procurify7%#5 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Market Dojo0%#– of 9
Procurify0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Market Dojo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Market Dojo is described as best for cost-conscious teams needing full sourcing workflows, offering a freemium sourcing suite” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Market Dojo for a mid-sized B2B company.” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Market Dojo (Best Overall for Pure E-Sourcing & Auctions)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Procurify

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Operational Tools (e.g., Procurify, Precoro): ... They generally *lack* true strategic sourcing features.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.