Strategic sourcing · November 2026 Edition
Market Dojo vs GEP SMART
Zero of fourteen models named Market Dojo first on the direct prompt; two named GEP SMART. Market Dojo was named by nine of the fourteen models and GEP SMART by thirteen and Market Dojo carries 16 labels and GEP SMART 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
First-choice share7%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%16%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1619A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Market Dojo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.oboloo vs Market Dojo · oboloo vs GEP SMART · Prokuria vs Market Dojo
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the strategic sourcing page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Market DojoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGEP SMART
Direct021 against GEP SMART
Paraphrase21
Comparative00
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained011 against GEP SMART
Negative001 against GEP SMART
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Market Dojo and GEP SMART stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Market Dojo GEP SMART first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Market Dojo on the left and GEP SMART on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Market Dojo and GEP SMART stood in it.
GEP SMART first, Market Dojo not the choice
2 of 14 modelsMarket Dojo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Perplexity SonarGEP SMART alternatives: Jaggaer, Proactis, Procurify
Llama 4 MaverickGEP SMART alternatives: Jaggaer, Oxalys, Proactis
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Corcentric Sourcing, Coupa, Zycus alternatives: Ivalua, Market Dojo, Proactis Sourcing
GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: GEP SMART, Ivalua, SAP Ariba Sourcing Suite
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: Archlet, Market Dojo, Scanmarket, Tropic, Vertice, Zip
Grok 4.20Procurify alternatives: Coupa, GEP SMART
DeepSeek V4 FlashProcurify alternatives: GEP SMART, Market Dojo, Precoro, Prokuria
Qwen 3.7 FlashCoupa Business Buying alternatives: GEP SMART, Ivalua, Jaggaer
GLM 4.7 FlashXno first choice alternatives: Market Dojo, Precoro, Procurify, Prokuria, TYASuite Procurement, Tradogram
GPT-6 LunaWorkday Strategic Sourcing alternatives: Coupa, GEP Quantum Intelligence, GEP SMART, Market Dojo
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Mistral SmallIvalua, SAP Ariba alternatives: P3Source, Team Procure
Kimi K2Procurify alternatives: Coupa, Ivalua, Jaggaer, Prokuria
MiniMax M2.5Prokuria alternatives: Coupa, TYASuite Procurement
Muse Glimmer 30BProkuria alternatives: Precoro, Procol, Procurify, cusoso Target
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Market Dojo leads by eight points.
Market Dojo8%#5 of 18GEP SMART0%#14 of 18Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Market Dojo7%#3 of 15GEP SMART7%#4 of 15Enterprise
The order flips: GEP SMART leads at enterprise.
GEP SMART6%#4 of 9Market Dojo0%#– of 9What the models said about Market Dojo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Market Dojo is described as best for cost-conscious teams needing full sourcing workflows, offering a freemium sourcing suite” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Market Dojo for a mid-sized B2B company.” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Market Dojo (Best Overall for Pure E-Sourcing & Auctions)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about GEP SMART
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“explicitly advise against these for SMBs due to their steep learning curves, high costs, and overkill for smaller operations” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Pure Mid-Market: (e.g., Procol, Sourcifi, GEP SMART, Coupa). ... These are usually the best fit for 500-person companies.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“The best strategic sourcing software for a mid-market B2B company is GEP SMART” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“GEP SMART is the strongest overall strategic-sourcing choice” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
oboloo vs Market Dojooboloo vs GEP SMARTProkuria vs Market DojoProkuria vs GEP SMARTMarket Dojo vs ProcurifyMarket Dojo vs IvaluaMarket Dojo vs PrecoroMarket Dojo vs CoupaGEP SMART vs ProcurifyGEP SMART vs IvaluaGEP SMART vs PrecoroGEP SMART vs CoupaAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full strategic sourcing standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.