Ramp vs Expensify
Ten of fourteen models named Ramp first on the direct prompt; zero named Expensify. Ramp was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Expensify by ten and Ramp carries 70 labels and Expensify 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in sixteen categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the spend management platforms page.
By framing
RampFirst choices, of fourteen modelsExpensify
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Ramp and Expensify were named in the same answer 230 times, of the 1022 answers naming Ramp and the 281 naming Expensify. In those answers Expensify took the first choice sixteen times and Ramp sixty-nine.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Ramp Expensify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Ramp on the left and Expensify on the right.The direct prompt
Ramp first, Expensify not the choice
10 of 14 modelsExpensify was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Ramp55%#1 of 14Expensify0%#8 of 14What the models said about Ramp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Modern All-in-One Spend Platforms | Ramp, Brex, Spendesk | Fast-growing mid-market companies wanting corporate cards, AP, expenses, and automated savings in one clean UI.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Expensify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Who Should Avoid It: Companies looking for transparent, predictable pricing models and high-touch customer support.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“I would recommend steering clear of it if you can.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“1. Expensify – Starting at $5/user/month - Best for: Small teams needing basic expense tracking” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The Best Overall Value: Expensify ... widely considered the gold standard for usability” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.