FP&A platforms · November 2026 Edition
Workday Adaptive Planning vs Jirav
One of fourteen models named Workday Adaptive Planning first on the direct prompt; zero named Jirav. Workday Adaptive Planning was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Jirav by ten and Workday Adaptive Planning carries 62 labels and Jirav 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate35%19%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels6216A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Workday Adaptive Planning reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Prophix was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Pigment vs Workday Adaptive Planning · Pigment vs Jirav · Prophix vs Workday Adaptive Planning
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the FP&A platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Workday Adaptive PlanningFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJirav
Direct101 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Paraphrase30
Comparative101 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Budget-constrained017 against Workday Adaptive Planning · 2 against Jirav
Scale-constrained003 against Workday Adaptive Planning
Negative0010 against Workday Adaptive Planning · 1 against Jirav
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Workday Adaptive Planning and Jirav stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Workday Adaptive Planning Jirav first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Workday Adaptive Planning on the left and Jirav on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Workday Adaptive Planning and Jirav stood in it.
Workday Adaptive Planning first, Jirav not the choice
1 of 14 modelsJirav was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashPlanful, Workday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Centage, Cube, Vena
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniVena alternatives: Anaplan, Datarails, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
Llama 4 MaverickAleph, Pigment, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Workday Adaptive Planning
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Planful alternatives: Cube, Prophix, Vena
Gemini 3.5 FlashAbacum, Mosaic alternatives: Cube, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, Vena
Perplexity SonarPigment alternatives: Aleph, Planful, Prophix
Grok 4.20Cube alternatives: Centage, Maxio, Planful, Vena
Mistral SmallPlanful alternatives: Pigment, Prophix
DeepSeek V4 FlashPigment alternatives: Aleph, Prophix
Kimi K2Pigment alternatives: Aleph, Datarails, Prophix, Vena
GLM 4.7 FlashXPigment alternatives: Aleph, Prophix
MiniMax M2.5Aleph, Pigment alternatives: Prophix, Vena
GPT-6 LunaPigment alternatives: Adaptive from Workday, Planful, Vena
Muse Glimmer 30BAleph, Pigment alternatives: Centage, Cube, Datarails, Prophix, Vena
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Jirav leads by nineteen points.
Jirav19%#2 of 17Workday Adaptive Planning0%#16 of 17Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Workday Adaptive Planning leads at mid-market.
Workday Adaptive Planning7%#6 of 14Jirav2%#8 of 14Enterprise
Workday Adaptive Planning leads by eleven points.
Workday Adaptive Planning11%#3 of 14Jirav0%#– of 14What the models said about Workday Adaptive Planning
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Avoid the mid-market "contact us" vendors (Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Pigment, Planful)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Workday Adaptive Planning and Prophix One are the most recommended due to their balance of functionality, scalability, and user-friendliness” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Jirav
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Be careful with "from $50/month" Jirav pricing: the public plans are described as being for FP&A advisory practices” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Jirav is an affordable entry point for small businesses ... making it a relatively cost-effective choice” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Pigment vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPigment vs JiravProphix vs Workday Adaptive PlanningProphix vs JiravCube vs Workday Adaptive PlanningCube vs JiravAleph vs Workday Adaptive PlanningAleph vs JiravPlanful vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPlanful vs JiravWorkday Adaptive Planning vs VenaVena vs JiravAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full FP&A platforms standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.