Identity threat detection and response · RankedSilverfort ITDR
Silverfort ITDR is an identity threat detection and response product from Silverfort · silverfort.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Huntress Managed ITDR is first at 77%.
Huntress Managed ITDR is first at 42%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Microsoft Defender for Identity is first at 37%.
Why models recommend it
“I'd recommend Silverfort as the best identity threat detection tool for a mid-sized B2B company”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Heavy legacy + diverse IdPs? → Silverfort (only true inline preventor)”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Best Overall for Hybrid Environments & Multi-IdP: Silverfort”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Silverfort (Top-tier, ~4.4/5 in reviews)”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Avoid for Limited Budgets: SentinelOne Singularity Identity, Varonis, or Silverfort”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid enterprise-priced solutions like Silverfort”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Silverfort or Microsoft Defender for Identity may fit better, but these solutions can require more configuration and budget than a managed SMB product.”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“purchasing a high-end, dedicated Enterprise ITDR ... platform (such as Silverfort, CrowdStrike Identity, or Semperis DSP) can be cost-prohibitive”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Silverfort ITDR, over the 109 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | 30 | Compare → | |
| 77 | 17 | Compare → | |
| 66 | 39 | Compare → | |
| 46 | 1 | View → | |
| 43 | 0 | View → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → | |
| 15 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Silverfort ITDR →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Silverfort ITDR's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- enterprise deals
- Price stated
- Contact us for a quote.
- Certifications
- CCPA, CPRA, EU-US DPF, GDPR, ISO 27001, Microsoft SSPA, NIST CSF, SOC 2
- Hosting
- On-Prem, Cloud, Hybrid, East-US, West-US, Germany-West, France-Central, West Europe (Netherlands)
- Customers named
- Kayak, Womble Bond Dickinson, Agilisys, Agoda, Payoneer, UPS, Singtel, Airbus
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 106 of the 109 answers that named Silverfort ITDR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
341 of the 367 domain citations in answers naming Silverfort ITDR came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 532 | 43 | 2026-09-25 | MFA, PAM | |
| News or press | 100 | 0 | 2026-06-08 | MFA, PAM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 68 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | MFA, IGA | |
| Case study | 19 | 1 | 2026-07-24 | MFA | |
| Report or ebook | 18 | 0 | 2026-01-24 | MFA | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 14 | 0 | 2026-06-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | MFA | |
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2026-04-02 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 2 | 2026-07-28 | MFA, PAM | |
| Podcast or video | 3 | 0 | 2026-05-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Silverfort integration with anthropic compliance api blog
- 2026-09-24Replicating part of the openai attack on hugging face blog
- 2026-09-21Runtime is where ai agent security gets real new research unpacks the arise framework blog
- 2026-09-16Silverfort and sentinelone risk based policy escalation blog
- 2026-09-11Papercut breach what ai agent attacks teach us about identity security resilience blog
- 2026-09-10Ai agent intent explained blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page silverfort.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name MFA (65); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.