CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection is an identity threat detection and response product from CrowdStrike · crowdstrike.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Huntress Managed ITDR is first at 77%.
Huntress Managed ITDR is first at 42%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Microsoft Defender for Identity is first at 37%.
“If your threat model prioritizes lateral movement & endpoint attacks: Consider CrowdStrike Falcon Identity or SentinelOne Singularity”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Best overall for most mid-market companies with an existing security team: CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen Identity Security”GPT-5.4 mini · Direct question · first choice
“If you already use a major EDR platform (like CrowdStrike or Microsoft Defender XDR), test their identity module first.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection — Best platform-consolidated; strong if you already use Falcon for EDR”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Avoid enterprise-priced solutions like Silverfort, CrowdStrike Falcon Identity, and SentinelOne Singularity Identity”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“have been criticized for being enterprise-heavy, with high per-identity costs ... These can be overkill for mid-market companies”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Maximum value requires broader Falcon platform investment and premium pricing compared to standalone ITDR.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“limitations emerge for organizations using diverse endpoint protection solutions”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection, over the 126 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 28 | Compare → | |
| 77 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 65 | 37 | Compare → | |
| 52 | 0 | View → | |
| 45 | 0 | View → | |
| 22 | 0 | View → | |
| 19 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 15 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 121 of the 126 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection and are not a share of its labels.
359 of the 390 domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon Identity Protection came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 3,995 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 750 | 16 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| News or press | 713 | 28 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Case study | 479 | 16 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 231 | 0 | 2026-03-24 | ||
| Comparison | 169 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 103 | 0 | 2026-05-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 20 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2026-03-05 |
As the event pages on crowdstrike.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page crowdstrike.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.