Seven of fourteen models named Huntress Managed ITDR first on the direct prompt; zero named Silverfort ITDR. Both were named by all fourteen models and Huntress Managed ITDR carries 47 labels and Silverfort ITDR 44, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity threat detection and response page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Huntress Managed ITDR and Silverfort ITDR were named in the same answer sixty-six times, of the 133 answers naming Huntress Managed ITDR and the 109 naming Silverfort ITDR. In those answers Silverfort ITDR took the first choice two times and Huntress Managed ITDR thirty-nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Huntress is generally highly rated... But if you rely heavily on Conditional Access or need granular alert context, test these specific scenarios thoroughly.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cautions: While highly rated for monitoring, users note that the dashboard can feel busy and lacks context on initial alerts.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Failure to investigate Microsoft risk events, passive logging without action, limited visibility” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Huntress Managed ITDR stands out as the best ITDR (Identity Threat Detection and Response) solution for companies with a limited budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Huntress Managed ITDR is the most commonly cited best-value, published-price ITDR with human-led SOC included at ~$4.80/identity MSRP” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“the best ITDR (Identity Threat Detection and Response) solution for a company with a limited budget is Huntress Managed ITDR” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid for Limited Budgets: SentinelOne Singularity Identity, Varonis, or Silverfort” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-priced solutions like Silverfort” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Silverfort or Microsoft Defender for Identity may fit better, but these solutions can require more configuration and budget than a managed SMB product.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Silverfort as the best identity threat detection tool for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Heavy legacy + diverse IdPs? → Silverfort (only true inline preventor)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Hybrid Environments & Multi-IdP: Silverfort” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.