Static application security testing · Named, not rankedMend SAST
Mend SAST is a static application security testing product from Mend · mend.io ↗
Named, too few times to rank.
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. Mend SAST has 5.
Why models recommend it
“Marketed as typically 10× faster than traditional SAST products with easy DevOps/CI-CD integration.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · alternative
“Mend is a strong choice... their SAST is mature and reliable”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct question · alternative
“Mend SAST if you want a tightly integrated platform”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · alternative
What gives them pause
No model argued against it.
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Mend SAST, over the 13 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 1 | View → | |
| 12 | 2 | View → | |
| 11 | 7 | View → | |
| 10 | 3 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 6 | 0 | View → | |
| 6 | 0 | View → | |
| 5 | 2 | View → | |
| 5 | 1 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Mend SAST's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- enterprise application developers
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 10 of the 13 answers that named Mend SAST and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Forty-six of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming Mend SAST came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |