Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › IT › Products › Lacework · November 2026 Edition

4 categories · Named, not ranked

Lacework

–Too few to rank

5/14Models named it

0First choices

3Warnings

November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.

Ranked inContainer and Kubernetes security #33 mid-market API security platforms #107 Breach and attack simulation #69 Data security posture management #90

What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. Lacework has 5.

Why models recommend it

“CNAPP (Wiz, Orca, Lacework, CrowdStrike Cloud Security)”Kimi K2 · Scale-constrained question · alternative

What gives them pause

“CSPM/CNAPP e.g., Wiz, Orca, Lacework: Infrastructure security team is the primary user, not data security”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning

“Lacework fell from $8.3B to ~$200M”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as Lacework, over the 8 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

Product	Named together	Picked instead
Wiz	6	1	View →
Sysdig Secure	5	2	View →
Aqua Security	4	0	View →
Falco	4	0	View →
Orca Security	4	0	View →
Prisma Cloud	4	0	View →
Snyk Container	4	0	View →
Trivy	4	0	View →
Qualys	2	0	View →
SUSE NeuVector	2	0	View →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named Lacework came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 6 of the 8 answers that named Lacework and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com3

softwareadvice.com3

aikido.dev2

aws.amazon.com2

bankinfosecurity.com2

capterra.com2

cubeapm.com2

gartner.com2

gbhackers.com2

orca.security2

No domain is on file for Lacework, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

softwareadvice.com/container-security3

capterra.com/container-security-software2

gbhackers.com/best-container-security-compared2

orca.security/resources/blog/what-to-look-for-in-container-security-tools2

safeguard.sh/resources/blog/container-security-platform2

zenarmor.com/docs/network-security-tutorials/top-container-security-tools2

download.1105media.com/pub/mcp/Files/Twistlock-Strategies_For_Securing_Highly_Scalable_Con1

0doubt.ai/categories/dspm1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on Lacework across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Warning	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1