GitLab Security
Listed in the vendor table for ASPM and SAST. Not named in any of the 168 answers those categories produced in the November 2026 Edition: fourteen models, six prompts per category and segment, every question asked three times, on behalf of a small B2B company, a mid-market B2B company and an enterprise B2B company, with every standing computed within one segment.
Standing
Not named in 168 answers
Absence in a measured set of answers is a finding, not a verdict: it says the models did not reach for GitLab Security when asked these questions this month. The products they named instead are listed by category below.
By buyer segment
The same categories asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each share and rank is computed within its segment; the columns sit side by side and are never added together.
| Category | Small business | Mid-market | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Static application security testing | 0% · 24 of 60 1 label | not named | not named |
| Application security posture management | 0% · 24 of 70 1 label | not named | not named |
Where it was not named
Each category GitLab Security belongs to, the answers collected there, and who the models named first instead.
| Category | Function | Named in | Named instead, first-choice share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application security posture management | Developer platform | 0 of 84 | Aikido Security 40% · DefectDojo 12% · Cycode ASPM 10% |
| Static application security testing | Developer platform | 0 of 84 | Semgrep AppSec Platform 71% · SonarQube 11% · Aikido Security 7% |
Is this your product?
Claim this listing
The measured results on this page stay as measured. The part from GitLab Security's own site, its card links and what it states, is the vendor's to correct. Claiming is free on every plan, with a sign-in at gitlab.com.