Index › IT › Products › GitHub Advanced Security › Alternatives · November 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to GitHub Advanced Security, as AI models named them

In the November 2026 Edition, 438 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where GitHub Advanced Security holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 438 answers that did not name GitHub Advanced Security, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Static application security testing

Developer platform. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when GitHub Advanced Security is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessGitHub Advanced Security is #6 of 14 here at 0% of first choices, 26 labels.

Sixty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub Advanced Security; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty-four answers, six products in all:

The full small business standing →
Mid-marketGitHub Advanced Security is #5 of 11 here at 2% of first choices, 24 labels.

Sixty-eight of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub Advanced Security; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those sixty-eight answers, seven products in all:

The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseGitHub Advanced Security is #6 of 10 here at 2% of first choices, 20 labels.

Seventy of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub Advanced Security; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those seventy answers, eleven products in all, the eight most named:

3 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Software composition analysis

Developer platform. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when GitHub Advanced Security is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessGitHub Advanced Security is #11 of 14 here at 0% of first choices, 10 labels.

Seventy-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub Advanced Security; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those seventy-nine answers, twelve products in all, the eight most named:

4 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketGitHub Advanced Security is #15 of 19 here at 0% of first choices, 13 labels.

Seventy-six of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub Advanced Security; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those seventy-six answers, eight products in all:

The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseGitHub Advanced Security is #9 of 14 here at 2% of first choices, 10 labels.

Eighty-one of the eighty-four answers did not name GitHub Advanced Security; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those eighty-one answers, twelve products in all, the eight most named:

4 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled GitHub Advanced Security neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named GitHub Advanced Security only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from GitHub Advanced Security's side.

The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of GitHub Advanced Security was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.