Index › IT › Developer platform › SAST › Semgrep AppSec Platform vs GitHub Advanced Security
Static application security testing · November 2026 Edition

Semgrep AppSec Platform vs GitHub Advanced Security

Nine of fourteen models named Semgrep AppSec Platform first on the direct prompt; one named GitHub Advanced Security. Semgrep AppSec Platform was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and GitHub Advanced Security by twelve and Semgrep AppSec Platform carries 69 labels and GitHub Advanced Security 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Named in one category this edition.

GitHub Advanced Security

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share71%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate1%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels6924A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Semgrep AppSec Platform reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SonarQube was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Semgrep AppSec Platform vs SonarQube · Semgrep AppSec Platform vs Aikido Security · Semgrep AppSec Platform vs Snyk Code

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the static application security testing page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Semgrep AppSec PlatformFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGitHub Advanced Security
Direct91
Paraphrase90
Comparative30
Budget-constrained140
Scale-constrained00
Negative501 against Semgrep AppSec Platform
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Semgrep AppSec Platform and GitHub Advanced Security were named in the same answer sixty-eight times, of the 199 answers naming Semgrep AppSec Platform and the 113 naming GitHub Advanced Security. In those answers GitHub Advanced Security took the first choice two times and Semgrep AppSec Platform thirty-three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Semgrep AppSec Platform and GitHub Advanced Security stood in it.
ModelDirectSAParaphraseSAComparativeSABudget-constrainedSAScale-constrainedSANegativeSA
Claude Haiku 4.5SASASA
GPT-5.4 miniSASASA
Gemini 3.5 FlashSASASASASA
Perplexity SonarSASASASA
Grok 4.20SASASASASA
Mistral SmallSASASASA
DeepSeek V4 FlashSASASASASA
Llama 4 MaverickSASASA
Qwen 3.7 FlashSASASASASA
Kimi K2SASASASASA
GLM 4.7 FlashXSASASASA
MiniMax M2.5SASASASA
GPT-6 LunaSASASASASA
Muse Glimmer 30BSASASASA
SA Semgrep AppSec Platform GitHub Advanced SecuritySA first choiceSA named as an alternativeSA argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Semgrep AppSec Platform on the left and GitHub Advanced Security on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Semgrep AppSec Platform and GitHub Advanced Security stood in it.

Semgrep AppSec Platform first, GitHub Advanced Security an alternative

9 of 14 modelsGitHub Advanced Security was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarSemgrep AppSec Platform alternatives: CodeQL, Snyk Code, SonarQube
Grok 4.20Semgrep AppSec Platform alternatives: Aikido Security, CodeAnt AI, GitLab SAST, Snyk Code
Mistral SmallAikido Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform alternatives: SonarQube
DeepSeek V4 FlashSemgrep AppSec Platform alternatives: Snyk Code, SonarQube
Llama 4 MaverickSemgrep AppSec Platform alternatives: Aikido Security, Snyk Code, SonarQube, ZeroPath
Qwen 3.7 FlashSemgrep AppSec Platform alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab SAST, Mend SAST, SonarQube
Kimi K2Semgrep AppSec Platform alternatives: Aikido Security, Snyk Code, SonarQube
MiniMax M2.5Semgrep AppSec Platform alternatives: Snyk Code, SonarQube
GPT-6 LunaSemgrep AppSec Platform alternatives: GitHub Code Security, Snyk Code

GitHub Advanced Security first, Semgrep AppSec Platform not the choice

1 of 14 modelsSemgrep AppSec Platform was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniGitHub Advanced Security alternatives: Checkmarx One

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Snyk, SonarQube alternatives: Mend SAST, Semgrep AppSec Platform
Gemini 3.5 FlashSnyk Code alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, Semgrep AppSec Platform, SonarQube
GLM 4.7 FlashXSnyk Code, SonarQube alternatives: Checkmarx One, GitLab SAST, Semgrep AppSec Platform
Muse Glimmer 30BAikido Security alternatives: Semgrep AppSec Platform, Snyk Code, SonarQube

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Semgrep AppSec Platform leads by eighty-two points.
Semgrep AppSec Platform82%#1 of 14
GitHub Advanced Security0%#6 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Semgrep AppSec Platform leads by sixty-nine points.
Semgrep AppSec Platform71%#1 of 11
GitHub Advanced Security2%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Semgrep AppSec Platform leads by six points.
Semgrep AppSec Platform8%#4 of 10
GitHub Advanced Security2%#6 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Semgrep AppSec Platform

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Semgrep Community Edition as your only deep-analysis scanner: ... its single-function analysis and community-rule coverage may miss issues” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Semgrep (with its free Community Edition) is widely regarded as one of the best SAST tools for companies operating on a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Semgrep offers the best balance of detection quality, developer experience, transparency, and cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Semgrep Community Edition is the best overall SAST tool due to its flexibility, broad language support, and strong community backing.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about GitHub Advanced Security

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“GitHub Advanced Security (CodeQL code scanning) is often the best default choice if your engineering team already uses GitHub” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“You already use GitHub extensively and want deep repository-native analysis | GitHub Advanced Security / CodeQL” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.