Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › IT › Products › Gateway Load Balancer · November 2026 Edition

Load balancers · Named, not ranked

Gateway Load Balancer

–Too few to rank

2/14Models named it

0First choices

1Warnings

November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.

Ranked inLoad balancers #78 mid-market

What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. Gateway Load Balancer has 2.

Why models recommend it

No positive label carried a quote.

What gives them pause

“GWLB adds complexity and is intended for inserting third-party network appliances, not as a general-purpose load balancer.”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as Gateway Load Balancer, over the 2 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

Product	Named together	Picked instead
HAProxy	1	1	View →
AWS Application Load Balancer	1	0	View →
AWS Basic Load Balancer	1	0	View →
AWS Classic Load Balancer	1	0	View →
Apache `mod_proxy_balancer`	1	0	View →
Application Load Balancer	1	0	View →
Azure Load Balancer	1	0	View →
Caddy	1	0	View →
Cloudflare Load Balancing	1	0	View →
Envoy	1	0	View →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named Gateway Load Balancer came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Gateway Load Balancer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

alivedise.github.io1

aws.github.io1

cloudandsre.com1

docs.aws.amazon.com1

docs.cloud.google.com1

docs.umbraco.com1

learn.microsoft.com1

loadbalancer.org1

rankite.com1

scmgalaxy.com1

No domain is on file for Gateway Load Balancer, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

alivedise.github.io/backend-engineering-essentials/networking-fundamentals/load-balancers1

aws.github.io/aws-networking-best-practices/application-networking/load-balancing1

cloudandsre.com/blog/load-balancing-and-health-checks1

docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticloadbalancing/latest/userguide/migrate-classic-load-balancer.ht1

docs.cloud.google.com/load-balancing/docs/choosing-load-balancer1

docs.umbraco.com/umbraco-cms/19.latest/run-in-production/infrastructure-and-ops/server-set1

learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/load-balancer/load-balancer-best-practices1

loadbalancer.org/blog/whats-the-best-cloud-load-balancer1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on Gateway Load Balancer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Warning	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.20	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0