CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is a privileged access management product from CyberArk that also covers secrets management · paloaltonetworks.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
KeeperPAM is first at 39%.
Delinea Secret Server is first at 39%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is ManageEngine PAM360 at 18%.
“Long regarded as the enterprise benchmark for PAM, CyberArk offers a comprehensive suite covering password vaulting, session recording, endpoint privilege management, and secrets management.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“CyberArk is the analyst consensus market leader: it has held the top position in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Privileged Access Management for over a decade”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
“Leader – most complete vision | CyberArk Core (Digital Vault)... Large enterprises (5 000+ employees) with complex hybrid & OT environments”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“Choose CyberArk for the deepest enterprise PAM program, extensive compliance requirements, and large heterogeneous environments.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · first choice
“Avoid enterprise giants like CyberArk, BeyondTrust, or One Identity unless you qualify for heavy discounts”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“What to Avoid for Mid-Market - CyberArk – Enterprise pricing (starts ~$45K+)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · warning
“What I'd Avoid: CyberArk (now Idira) — Overkill for most mid-sized companies”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · warning
“Organizations evaluating CyberArk should assess roadmap continuity, support timelines and any changes in licensing, integration and personnel following the Palo Alto Networks acquisition and rebrand.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, over the 178 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 150 | 23 | View → | |
| 146 | 7 | View → | |
| 91 | 23 | View → | |
| 73 | 19 | View → | |
| 58 | 1 | View → | |
| 53 | 2 | View → | |
| 47 | 0 | View → | |
| 38 | 3 | View → | |
| 35 | 5 | View → | |
| 27 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 158 of the 178 answers that named CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and are not a share of its labels.
443 of the 443 domain citations in answers naming CyberArk Privileged Access Manager came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 3,467 | 39 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1,861 | 0 | 2011-10-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 535 | 0 | 2015-08-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 430 | 0 | 2022-07-04 | ||
| News or press | 408 | 0 | 2018-12-01 | ||
| Case study | 351 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 104 | 0 | 2019-08-08 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 87 | 0 | 2018-07-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 87 | 0 | 2018-04-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 21 | undated |
Every page paloaltonetworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.