Zero of fourteen models named Cisco Secure Network Analytics first on the direct prompt; zero named ExtraHop RevealX. Both were named by all fourteen models and Cisco Secure Network Analytics carries 25 labels and ExtraHop RevealX 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the network detection and response page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Cisco Secure Network Analytics and ExtraHop RevealX were named in the same answer fifty-five times, of the 86 answers naming Cisco Secure Network Analytics and the 104 naming ExtraHop RevealX. In those answers ExtraHop RevealX took the first choice ten times and Cisco Secure Network Analytics three.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Multiple concerns from users: Complex setup and configuration ... High false positive rates” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“a fraction of the cost of tier-1 enterprise brands (like Palo Alto Networks or Cisco)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Mixed but generally functional in enterprise settings. Cisco can feel legacy” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best NDR platform for a company with a limited budget is Corelight or Cisco Secure Network Analytics.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Traditional Enterprise Network | Darktrace or Cisco Secure Network Analytics” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“designed to monitor massive, globally distributed enterprise networks, with native integration into Cisco network infrastructure” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Noted for: Being more of a network monitoring company than cybersecurity-focused” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“ExtraHop — enterprise-grade pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Premium tools such as Darktrace or ExtraHop may be powerful, but calculate sensor, storage, packet-processing, integration, and analyst costs over several years” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Consistently ranked as a leader in G2's Momentum Grid for NDR, ExtraHop is praised for high satisfaction and momentum scores.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“For deepest network forensics: Choose ExtraHop or NetWitness.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“ExtraHop — Excellent visibility, strong ML, easy UI.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.